calibcant/overview.tex: Give a road map for the rest of this chapter

diff --git a/src/calibcant/overview.tex b/src/calibcant/overview.tex
index f70f33a27f7d2035bb2baf04ef8d24977b0e61af..b47a10f93a97f9494a3cb2a5ea77a3b12352e299 100644 (file)
--- a/src/calibcant/overview.tex
+++ b/src/calibcant/overview.tex
@@ -75,6 +75,17 @@ buffer temperature $T$ with a thermocouple
 when the tip is far from the surface to extract the fit parameters
 $G_{1f}$, $f_0$, and $\beta_f$ (\cref{sec:calibcant:vibration}).
 
 when the tip is far from the surface to extract the fit parameters
 $G_{1f}$, $f_0$, and $\beta_f$ (\cref{sec:calibcant:vibration}).
 

+Although this theory should be well established
+(\cref{sec:calibcant:survey}), there is continued confusion about the
+details of the fitting (\cref{sec:calibcant:lorentzian}).  To avoid
+further ambiguity, I'll derive the power spectral density mentioned
+above (\cref{eq:psd-Vp,eq:avg-Vp-Gone-f})
+in \cref{sec:calibcant:theory}.  In \cref{calibcant/procedure}, I'll
+introduce my \calibcant\ package for automatically calibrating
+cantilevers.  I'll clear up a few remaining points
+in \cref{sec:calibcant:discussion} before wrapping up
+with \cref{sec:calibcant:conclusions}.
+

 \section{Related work}
 \label{sec:calibcant:survey}
 
 \section{Related work}
 \label{sec:calibcant:survey}