f6/1f23ae659bb7c7aebaee64d0ed747bf0da365e

   1 Return-Path: <xma@gnu.org>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 802A2431FB6\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:41:45 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: 1.463\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: *\r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP=1]\r
  13         autolearn=disabled\r
  14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  16         with ESMTP id XfsaH1kDibGB for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  17         Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:41:43 -0800 (PST)\r
  18 Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net\r
  19         [88.164.105.66])\r
  20         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDA2431FB5\r
  21         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:41:43 -0800 (PST)\r
  22 Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [127.0.0.1])\r
  23         by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC951E07A;\r
  24         Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:41:41 +0100 (CET)\r
  25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to\r
  26         :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id\r
  27         :mime-version:content-type; s=postfix; bh=6SdZ+252gZ8KxUhCzAn5Xl\r
  28         7PBcU=; b=FOo8N3Zd9ZgARwKpMBYemKNbHv3mxVQ6KSjV4MaQZ8oEuLEWupgZqN\r
  29         Ub4LlANtr+4XlR9Vv9ApVTwrG2OUD41upCBPhEPOt3696R47jR891A5egFPSSwbc\r
  30         ZGNkuaO35mbc7Bbox2+qtHpUHS0to86W/tRgb9/lHMPOTHnaJ5SIU=\r
  31 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=maillard.im; h=from:to\r
  32         :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id\r
  33         :mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=postfix; b=bwcHunGEWUCNUaC+\r
  34         NJ56+LwSVizay+234tFs92MVQwBLPVaJplkkmplh2pKHrrkpgOo6u1RSofF6L0q3\r
  35         kZSDMWxuh9VTjndj7RsQkD+udd4rb+NJGpR8S/9llx4Lmk5i5X07KmSPyyGKyKli\r
  36         vLXMGXktW7CVyVi8u47dJzjCFwk=\r
  37 Received: from maillard.im (unknown [192.168.0.254])\r
  38         (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
  39         (No client certificate requested)\r
  40         by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA;\r
  41         Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:41:41 +0100 (CET)\r
  42 From: Xavier Maillard <xavier@maillard.im>\r
  43 To: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  44 Subject: Re: RFC: Dovecot locking\r
  45 In-Reply-To: <87zkpvv01u.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org>\r
  46 References: <87zkpvv01u.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org>\r
  47 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
  48         (i486-slackware-linux-gnu)\r
  49 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:50:57 +0100\r
  50 Message-ID: <m2d3mewe1q.fsf@gnu.org>\r
  51 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
  53 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  54 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  55 Precedence: list\r
  56 Reply-To: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>\r
  57 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  58         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  59 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  60         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  61 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  62 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  63 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  64 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  65         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  66 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 23:41:45 -0000\r
  67 \r
  68 Hi Rob,\r
  69 \r
  70 On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:59:09 -0600, Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org> wrote:\r
  71 \r
  72 > For now, I'm interested in general comments, i.e. is this desirable, is\r
  73 > it a reasonable approach, etc.  As you can see, there's no config\r
  74 > handling yet, so -llockfile is added unconditionally.\r
  75 \r
  76 I need this since I can't currently use notmuch-remote due to these\r
  77 stale files making 'notmuch new' failing.\r
  78 \r
  79 I won't comment about your approach since I am no expert both with\r
  80 notmuch codebase and C :D\r
  81 \r
  82 I hope I will be able to play with notmuch-remote soon.\r
  83 \r
  84 /Xavier\r