Return-Path: <xma@gnu.org>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 802A2431FB6
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:41:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.463
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP=1]
	autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id XfsaH1kDibGB for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:41:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net
	[88.164.105.66])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDA2431FB5
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:41:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [127.0.0.1])
	by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC951E07A;
	Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:41:41 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to
	:subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id
	:mime-version:content-type; s=postfix; bh=6SdZ+252gZ8KxUhCzAn5Xl
	7PBcU=; b=FOo8N3Zd9ZgARwKpMBYemKNbHv3mxVQ6KSjV4MaQZ8oEuLEWupgZqN
	Ub4LlANtr+4XlR9Vv9ApVTwrG2OUD41upCBPhEPOt3696R47jR891A5egFPSSwbc
	ZGNkuaO35mbc7Bbox2+qtHpUHS0to86W/tRgb9/lHMPOTHnaJ5SIU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=maillard.im; h=from:to
	:subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id
	:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=postfix; b=bwcHunGEWUCNUaC+
	NJ56+LwSVizay+234tFs92MVQwBLPVaJplkkmplh2pKHrrkpgOo6u1RSofF6L0q3
	kZSDMWxuh9VTjndj7RsQkD+udd4rb+NJGpR8S/9llx4Lmk5i5X07KmSPyyGKyKli
	vLXMGXktW7CVyVi8u47dJzjCFwk=
Received: from maillard.im (unknown [192.168.0.254])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA;
	Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:41:41 +0100 (CET)
From: Xavier Maillard <xavier@maillard.im>
To: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Dovecot locking
In-Reply-To: <87zkpvv01u.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org>
References: <87zkpvv01u.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
	(i486-slackware-linux-gnu)
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:50:57 +0100
Message-ID: <m2d3mewe1q.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 23:41:45 -0000

Hi Rob,

On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:59:09 -0600, Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org> wrote:

> For now, I'm interested in general comments, i.e. is this desirable, is
> it a reasonable approach, etc.  As you can see, there's no config
> handling yet, so -llockfile is added unconditionally.

I need this since I can't currently use notmuch-remote due to these
stale files making 'notmuch new' failing.

I won't comment about your approach since I am no expert both with
notmuch codebase and C :D

I hope I will be able to play with notmuch-remote soon.

/Xavier