1 Return-Path: <daniel.schoepe@googlemail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8B9431FD0
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 10:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.789 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]
\r
15 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
16 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
17 with ESMTP id J2PMbohVYc0q for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
18 Sat, 9 Jul 2011 10:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
\r
19 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com (mail-fx0-f46.google.com
\r
20 [209.85.161.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
21 (No client certificate requested)
\r
22 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C912431FB6
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 10:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 Received: by fxh19 with SMTP id 19so2914304fxh.19
\r
25 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 10:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
\r
26 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
27 d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
\r
28 h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id
\r
29 :mime-version:content-type;
\r
30 bh=fhjZQsEwCQfYIaWyunfNc7MyDzQagv6NwspI62XXKHI=;
\r
31 b=MnqsnZs6aX9Jxh6hfd4LtXpTsweKqH5oHQyuXiclIGKKDIqGuB1zWB4RuLaQdBU6Sm
\r
32 kigRZLNyfVfSZ4HClG4U0pCDc/WcvWG67bMvT6IX4GH4AyqmQHuD5COVTDqYWrdXcQY6
\r
33 9SijA9yq6JvWBlJwrI3K4f+BLlYaMYUrPubgs=
\r
34 Received: by 10.223.7.150 with SMTP id d22mr4805092fad.17.1310231245838;
\r
35 Sat, 09 Jul 2011 10:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
\r
36 Received: from localhost (dslb-178-004-073-181.pools.arcor-ip.net
\r
38 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q14sm1572426faa.27.2011.07.09.10.07.21
\r
39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
40 Sat, 09 Jul 2011 10:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
\r
41 From: Daniel Schoepe <daniel.schoepe@googlemail.com>
\r
42 To: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
43 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] emacs: User-defined sections in notmuch-hello
\r
44 In-Reply-To: <87box48jkc.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
\r
46 <id:"1309379221-5617-1-git-send-email-daniel.schoepe@googlemail.com">
\r
47 <1310079227-19120-1-git-send-email-daniel.schoepe@googlemail.com>
\r
48 <1310079227-19120-2-git-send-email-daniel.schoepe@googlemail.com>
\r
49 <87box48jkc.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
\r
50 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-329-g0b5d38d (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
51 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
52 Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 19:07:13 +0200
\r
53 Message-ID: <87fwmf2xj2.fsf@gilead.invalid>
\r
55 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
56 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
57 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
58 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
60 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
61 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
62 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
63 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
64 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
65 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
66 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
67 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
68 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
69 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 17:07:28 -0000
\r
73 On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 01:00:03 +0200, Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> wrote:
\r
74 > Yes, this is definitely a good idea. My last comment to the patch is
\r
75 > that I do not like the use of plists in customization interface. It is
\r
76 > especially weird in the case of boolean options like hide-if-empty,
\r
77 > because they actually have three states: disabled, off and on. And this
\r
78 > make not a lot of sense.
\r
80 I just realized we overlooked the simplest solution: Changing the (boolean ..)
\r
81 elements to (const :tag "..." t) elements resolves this nicely.
\r
83 I'll send a new version shortly.
\r
89 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
91 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
92 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
\r
94 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOGIrBAAoJEIaTAtce+Z+J0NEP/jSRpSEJlBOPT0Q+D42pTYUz
\r
95 ECYfw7f0TWwv9axrK9YtOUTYE37ox4TUtUTsfr0Q3frJ0ru2MmMI+XsJg+8wMnQG
\r
96 dMU1I4OwfnmL6zFOI2xYZpy7Rvrf0VKCA1IUZwaL1FhSfM495M6esXUiIqEm70eE
\r
97 WW7aQOTZXwowKV01IQr8CJu1u6GgNK48twGboq8AvpqAcABmODTTVpbzPAt8lP2c
\r
98 GlbHOLaiD258N4zG7ZTUdTLWpCvhpp8IyFA0BJfC65fWj9QB9VaBlWE9CHBBERCB
\r
99 tfoGvIBnmTbEsvY3N0b3WigqMEV7H3VqkzBeu5F4gcb3UWI/PTIb6Oqis8EYPngA
\r
100 LtW3n9Z8kTeXpeBbrAYrUjeE0nKUYd0OTRzX6gaTjBrsp8D4lo30pstD6BlVuZBH
\r
101 CInzdiAxpjUBA6HdAbaEROUy+oHgF1ArCAXBjV71tfrfE7RjbfFc7qemistTeW0A
\r
102 snpbpVJ6aIX06FfUabtgReIYmioc4/DHTQKrSmQV3JUYbvxMx619AwGz/NzneZFK
\r
103 MY5sGRjVMMhI2UgR4t5/1jKwBlgA6c/bYZtqYpNVFj7j1fLBnlutEwWkUlW4haxJ
\r
104 3raSHb2KmsnXa0HBRsHLelDrTc/utCDmNf3QnmGihBpskl608QbtOKYjM5tqyoFr
\r
105 ifVJrDfIV+vnknMlnhRL
\r
107 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r