1 Return-Path: <novalazy@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2248B431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=2.499, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7]
\r
15 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
16 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
17 with ESMTP id ptsuceMBzqVb for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
18 Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
\r
19 Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com (mail-pa0-f48.google.com
\r
20 [209.85.220.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
21 (No client certificate requested)
\r
22 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 446A0431FAE
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id kp12so8498515pab.35
\r
25 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
\r
26 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
27 h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references
\r
28 :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition
\r
29 :content-transfer-encoding;
\r
30 bh=AMjHWA/tXig6YRL74n86iS+0XyPbPIiKffv9xWxME74=;
\r
31 b=Bfanhjoc2UlxaNoBm812I67oNQzkZ1GU4KKYkT9c105MeDniRt7ErDNDGPwYf9HZR0
\r
32 kSIicNxPbfPMrccoft4T0aVxhWfPpgRCzpbAjeANGXIaMOZfHJnclZ5OpxzREHbZ+NH6
\r
33 RVsP3AdJY80mRH9W0kvpzvBBSdgzuRiFDAqGcXcOdI8UEQAad/UoI8KE8vj+cHPbi3Rf
\r
34 Ygr0qP6P/J2RIbNQ5B78AnG8e59Jw1TaqBH9EcN3BmG/axSJckm/4Pg3ADSmrAda7iTy
\r
35 nkLcmq0rbFLzK8qcELH2qW2gEGLxD1akk/i/gdKMx29xzvy56+sWr64HobougIt2i7L3
\r
37 X-Received: by 10.68.223.34 with SMTP id qr2mr6770083pbc.75.1371858894395;
\r
38 Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
\r
39 Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au.
\r
41 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ri8sm6753646pbc.3.2013.06.21.16.54.51
\r
42 for <multiple recipients>
\r
43 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
\r
44 Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
\r
45 Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 09:55:36 +1000
\r
46 Message-ID: <20130622095536.GA1996@hili.localdomain>
\r
47 From: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>
\r
48 To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
49 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] lib: add NOTMUCH_EXCLUDE_FLAG to notmuch_exclude_t
\r
50 In-Reply-To: <m2txkrk9ua.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
51 References: <1368301809-12532-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
52 <1368301809-12532-8-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
53 <87bo8edif8.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <87fvwdx19x.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
54 <m2txkrk9ua.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
56 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
\r
57 Content-Disposition: inline
\r
58 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
\r
59 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
60 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
61 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
63 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
64 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
65 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
66 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
67 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
68 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
69 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
70 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
71 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
72 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 23:55:08 -0000
\r
74 On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:59:57 +0300, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote:
\r
75 > On Thu, Jun 20 2013, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
77 > > I think we should decide before 0.16 whether to go with this patch and
\r
78 > > patch 8/8 or for Peter's suggestion at
\r
79 > > id:1368454815-1854-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com
\r
81 > > Now we have an enum for the NOTMUCH_EXCLUDE possibilities (rather than a
\r
82 > > bool) I think it makes sense to implement NOTMUCH_EXCLUDE_FALSE properly
\r
83 > > but I am happy with either choice.
\r
85 > So, the choice here is to choose between
\r
87 > id:"1368454815-1854-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com"
\r
89 > id:"87bo8edif8.fsf@qmul.ac.uk"
\r
91 > (might be hard to catch from this thread -- was easier to take from
\r
92 > http://nmbug.tethera.net/status/ )
\r
94 > Both apply cleanly to current master ( d0bd88f )
\r
96 > While Peter's version surely looks simpler (and may work, didn't test atm)
\r
97 > the comments Mark presents makes sense (especially the "subtlety" thing ;)
\r
99 > IMHO Mark's version makes future development "safer" and therefore my
\r
100 > vote (or million of those) goes to id:"87bo8edif8.fsf@qmul.ac.uk"
\r
102 Sure, I don't care.
\r