1 Return-Path: <teythoon@jade-hamburg.de>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C452E431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 10 May 2012 07:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id nJn3QRKhoBDl for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Thu, 10 May 2012 07:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from mail.cryptobitch.de (cryptobitch.de [88.198.7.68])
\r
18 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77F0A431FAE
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 10 May 2012 07:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: from mail.jade-hamburg.de (mail.jade-hamburg.de [85.183.11.228])
\r
23 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
24 (No client certificate requested)
\r
25 by mail.cryptobitch.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 651BC589EE1
\r
26 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 10 May 2012 16:36:53 +0200 (CEST)
\r
27 Received: by mail.jade-hamburg.de (Postfix, from userid 401)
\r
28 id D3B87DF2A3; Thu, 10 May 2012 16:36:52 +0200 (CEST)
\r
29 Received: from thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de (thinkbox.jadE-Hamburg.de
\r
30 [10.1.1.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client
\r
31 certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: teythoon) by
\r
32 mail.jade-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19990DF2A0; Thu, 10 May 2012
\r
33 16:36:50 +0200 (CEST)
\r
34 Received: from teythoon by thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de with local (Exim 4.77)
\r
35 (envelope-from <teythoon@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>)
\r
36 id 1SSUU6-0006JR-9L; Thu, 10 May 2012 16:36:50 +0200
\r
37 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
\r
39 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
40 To: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>,
\r
41 From: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
\r
42 In-Reply-To: <20120509180700.GA11804@mit.edu>
\r
44 <1336558988-6813-1-git-send-email-4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
\r
45 <20120509180700.GA11804@mit.edu>
\r
46 Message-ID: <20120510143650.5975.92158@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>
\r
47 User-Agent: alot/0.3+
\r
48 Subject: Re: Last minute fixes to the go bindings
\r
49 Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 16:36:50 +0200
\r
50 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
51 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
52 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
54 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
55 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
56 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
57 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
58 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
59 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
61 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
62 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
63 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 14:36:57 -0000
\r
65 Quoting Austin Clements (2012-05-09 20:07:00)
\r
69 > Quoth Justus Winter on May 09 at 12:23 pm:
\r
73 > > this is a small patch series that I'd like to see included in 0.13.
\r
76 > > The first patch updates notmuch-addrlookup with respect to Austins
\r
77 > > recent change of the notmuch_database_open function. This fixes the
\r
78 > > compilation of the utility.
\r
81 > > The second patch fixes the values of all the STATUS_* constants. Turns
\r
82 > > out all of them were set to zero by accident. This isn't a c style
\r
83 > > enum, golang has the iota operator to do this kind of stuff. This
\r
84 > > fixes the error handling for all the users of the go bindings.
\r
87 > 'Doh! Is it possible to get the status values out of cgo, rather than
\r
88 > depending on the list in libnotmuch and the list in Go being in the
\r
91 Yes, it is and I've prepared a patch. But since I'm living in go 1
\r
92 land here I prepared it on top of my go 1 patchset and I'm thinking of
\r
93 sending it once that one got merged.
\r
95 @David: what do you think about merging this patch set?
\r