1 Return-Path: <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE21D4196F0
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id udVTMtt1ZRqg for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E326A431FC1
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
\r
20 Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.4])
\r
21 by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19BA19F342F;
\r
22 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:22:50 +0200 (CEST)
\r
23 X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS
\r
24 Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1])
\r
25 by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.4]) (amavisd-new,
\r
27 with ESMTP id ei1YJo0Kj1Yg; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:22:49 +0200 (CEST)
\r
28 Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34])
\r
29 by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925C919F3403;
\r
30 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:22:49 +0200 (CEST)
\r
31 Received: from steelpick.2x.cz (k335-30.felk.cvut.cz [147.32.86.30])
\r
32 (Authenticated sender: sojkam1)
\r
33 by imap.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6127CFA003;
\r
34 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:22:49 +0200 (CEST)
\r
35 Received: from wsh by steelpick.2x.cz with local (Exim 4.71)
\r
36 (envelope-from <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>)
\r
37 id 1NwWin-0002CC-0P; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:22:49 +0200
\r
38 From: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
39 To: spaetz <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
40 In-Reply-To: <1269904825545-684691.post@n3.nabble.com>
\r
41 References: <1269638293-23520-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
42 <878w9dqqub.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <878w9d2ovw.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
43 <87zl1tgje4.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
\r
44 <1269904825545-684691.post@n3.nabble.com>
\r
45 Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:22:48 +0200
\r
46 Message-ID: <874ojy9q1z.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
\r
48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
49 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Prevent data loss caused by SIGINT during
\r
51 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
52 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
54 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
55 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
56 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
57 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
58 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
59 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
61 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
62 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
63 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:22:53 -0000
\r
65 On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, spaetz wrote:
\r
67 > hehe, this version compiles but has the logic inverted. Removing the ! from
\r
68 > your patch makes it actually work as intended :--).
\r
70 Right! I should definitely be more careful even for such a trivial
\r
71 patches :) It's interesting, that in my branch, I have no negation.
\r
73 I send the patch once again.
\r