Return-Path: <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE21D4196F0
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.5
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id udVTMtt1ZRqg for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E326A431FC1
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.4])
	by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19BA19F342F;
	Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:22:50 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS
Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1])
	by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.4]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10044)
	with ESMTP id ei1YJo0Kj1Yg; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:22:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34])
	by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925C919F3403;
	Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:22:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from steelpick.2x.cz (k335-30.felk.cvut.cz [147.32.86.30])
	(Authenticated sender: sojkam1)
	by imap.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6127CFA003;
	Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:22:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from wsh by steelpick.2x.cz with local (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>)
	id 1NwWin-0002CC-0P; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:22:49 +0200
From: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
To: spaetz <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
In-Reply-To: <1269904825545-684691.post@n3.nabble.com>
References: <1269638293-23520-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
	<878w9dqqub.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <878w9d2ovw.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
	<87zl1tgje4.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
	<1269904825545-684691.post@n3.nabble.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:22:48 +0200
Message-ID: <874ojy9q1z.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Prevent data loss caused by SIGINT during
	notmuch new
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:22:53 -0000

On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, spaetz wrote:
> 
> hehe, this version compiles but has the logic inverted. Removing the ! from
> your patch makes it actually work as intended :--).

Right! I should definitely be more careful even for such a trivial
patches :) It's interesting, that in my branch, I have no negation.

I send the patch once again.

Michal