1 Return-Path: <michael.hudson@canonical.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5959640DDE8
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:45:56 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id J0R3duyb-N5V for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:45:46 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from adelie.canonical.com (adelie.canonical.com [91.189.90.139])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3992340DDDF
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:45:46 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from hutte.canonical.com ([91.189.90.181])
\r
21 by adelie.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian))
\r
22 id 1PHkOO-0000yk-9g; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:45:44 +0000
\r
23 Received: from 158.96.124.202.static.snap.net.nz ([202.124.96.158] helo=grond)
\r
24 by hutte.canonical.com with esmtpsa
\r
25 (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69)
\r
26 (envelope-from <michael.hudson@canonical.com>)
\r
27 id 1PHkOL-0005Zl-LC; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:45:44 +0000
\r
28 Received: by grond (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
29 id C8A7C20E137; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:45:32 +1300 (NZDT)
\r
30 From: Michael Hudson <michael.hudson@canonical.com>
\r
31 To: Matthieu Lemerre <racin@free.fr>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
32 Subject: Re: [PATCH] How to improve the mail handling workflow?
\r
33 In-Reply-To: <87fwv65zw1.fsf@free.fr>
\r
34 References: <87fwv65zw1.fsf@free.fr>
\r
35 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.50.1
\r
36 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
37 Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:45:32 +1300
\r
38 Message-ID: <877hgfpojn.fsf@canonical.com>
\r
40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
41 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
42 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
44 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
45 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
46 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
47 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
48 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
49 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
50 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
51 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
52 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
53 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:45:56 -0000
\r
55 On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre <racin@free.fr> wrote:
\r
56 > - Processing mails which do not have any automatically added tag is
\r
57 > boring, because I need to press several keys to archive them: "+" to
\r
58 > add a tag, and then "a". If I forget about +, then my mail is
\r
59 > impossible to find.
\r
61 I think what I want here is "undo last tagging operation". You need a
\r
62 way for 'notmuch tag' to report what it did for this to be possible
\r
65 I'd also like a way of binding keys to the operation of "adding a
\r
66 particular tag, removng the 'inbox' tag, move to next mail in search".
\r
67 I've seen a few people talk about this, surely someone will get around
\r
68 to implementing it eventually!
\r