Return-Path: <michael.hudson@canonical.com>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5959640DDE8
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:45:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id J0R3duyb-N5V for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:45:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from adelie.canonical.com (adelie.canonical.com [91.189.90.139])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3992340DDDF
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:45:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hutte.canonical.com ([91.189.90.181])
	by adelie.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian))
	id 1PHkOO-0000yk-9g; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:45:44 +0000
Received: from 158.96.124.202.static.snap.net.nz ([202.124.96.158] helo=grond)
	by hutte.canonical.com with esmtpsa
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <michael.hudson@canonical.com>)
	id 1PHkOL-0005Zl-LC; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:45:44 +0000
Received: by grond (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id C8A7C20E137; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:45:32 +1300 (NZDT)
From: Michael Hudson <michael.hudson@canonical.com>
To: Matthieu Lemerre <racin@free.fr>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] How to improve the mail handling workflow?
In-Reply-To: <87fwv65zw1.fsf@free.fr>
References: <87fwv65zw1.fsf@free.fr>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.50.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:45:32 +1300
Message-ID: <877hgfpojn.fsf@canonical.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:45:56 -0000

On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre <racin@free.fr> wrote:
>  - Processing mails which do not have any automatically added tag is
>    boring, because I need to press several keys to archive them: "+" to
>    add a tag, and then "a". If I forget about +, then my mail is
>    impossible to find.

I think what I want here is "undo last tagging operation".  You need a
way for 'notmuch tag' to report what it did for this to be possible
though...

I'd also like a way of binding keys to the operation of "adding a
particular tag, removng the 'inbox' tag, move to next mail in search".
I've seen a few people talk about this, surely someone will get around
to implementing it eventually!

Cheers,
mwh