1 Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C041E6DE0222
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 03:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.017 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[AWL=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01]
\r
14 Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id hj9QQ8YlZOKl for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Fri, 15 Apr 2016 03:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])
\r
19 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D9796DE00F5
\r
20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 03:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
\r
21 Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)
\r
22 (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
\r
23 id 1ar10A-0004mB-U7; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 06:29:26 -0400
\r
24 Received: (nullmailer pid 8795 invoked by uid 1000);
\r
25 Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:29:16 -0000
\r
26 From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
\r
27 To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,
\r
28 Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
29 Cc: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>
\r
30 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] complete
\r
31 ghost-on-removal-when-shared-thread-exists
\r
32 In-Reply-To: <87wpo362er.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
33 References: <1459445693-3900-1-git-send-email-dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
34 <1460166892-29721-1-git-send-email-dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
35 <1460166892-29721-7-git-send-email-dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
36 <87r3ed6l35.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87zit0t0mj.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
\r
37 <87wpo362er.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
38 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+99~gd93d377 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1
\r
39 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
40 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 07:29:16 -0300
\r
41 Message-ID: <87potri2rn.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
43 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
44 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
45 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
\r
47 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
48 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
49 List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
50 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
51 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
\r
52 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
53 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
54 List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
55 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
56 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:29:32 -0000
\r
58 David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:
\r
60 > Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> writes:
\r
63 >> I don't think this reasoning is sensible. If the entire thread is
\r
64 >> deleted, and a new message comes in, it should *not* get the same mesage
\r
65 >> ID. ghosts should only exist in the database when other messages point
\r
68 >> So i'd be fine with killing this entire last test, unless someone can
\r
69 >> propose a good reason to keep it.
\r
71 > I think I buy your reasoning, but I'd be happy if Austin (who introduced
\r
72 > ghost messages, and wrote that test, could comment.
\r
74 I have pushed the series, amended to remove that one test from T530.
\r