1 Return-Path: <five9a2@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229E1431FBF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:54:21 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
8 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
9 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
10 with ESMTP id OFK+uisBHsgR for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
11 Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:54:20 -0800 (PST)
\r
12 Received: from mail-yw0-f200.google.com (mail-yw0-f200.google.com
\r
14 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B746B431FAE
\r
15 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:54:20 -0800 (PST)
\r
16 Received: by ywh38 with SMTP id 38so4273942ywh.6
\r
17 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:54:20 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
19 h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:to:subject
\r
20 :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
21 bh=yIskciFehAFrnP86KSNHx3G0Pkfdjw+7r18QJnEco+Q=;
\r
22 b=q6gKh8a8EL0bXQ903QGz9jHglv/UCMy0TMpxLqc6ejdnEB7Yh2ksHwt/93rZxZyTwD
\r
23 t1OBtxHdiFlUwmWLXczNOIRy8BgFNYn5YMUDbd82/WechzcAGjWrpWVb5dwPOZ6NhdC+
\r
24 8ExtXPVuJC9bGse2nYlXufxC/GtWTyA90Bm2E=
\r
25 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
26 h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
\r
27 :mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 b=KvnIxnD+ryIkP66nIi9jbD+Sm5mjxZE5td4hUCGK/DdLIxRb7+DZDnGd2cZuaixD3e
\r
29 eyHdAore9VfQmt9c6I5/KBl0Mwg8Eoo7p0lTN2rBlZ7RREF7cWCFDYZH+5nf3m7aJIU+
\r
30 4GVO/sUEfPEGPmPXuar9hZHchnNU9+ngTAwkI=
\r
31 Received: by 10.150.71.31 with SMTP id t31mr8102948yba.18.1261220057079;
\r
32 Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:54:17 -0800 (PST)
\r
33 Received: from kunyang ([216.38.153.2])
\r
34 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm2876647iwn.13.2009.12.19.02.54.13
\r
35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
\r
36 Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:54:16 -0800 (PST)
\r
37 Sender: Jed Brown <five9a2@gmail.com>
\r
38 From: Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org>
\r
39 To: Alex Ghitza <aghitza@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
40 In-Reply-To: <54hbrnpod1.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
41 References: <54hbrnpod1.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
42 Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:55:16 -0800
\r
43 Message-ID: <8763836xnv.fsf@59A2.org>
\r
45 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
46 Subject: Re: [notmuch] keeping a copy of sent mail locally
\r
47 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
48 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
\r
50 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
51 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
52 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
53 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
54 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
55 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
56 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
57 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
58 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
59 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:54:21 -0000
\r
61 On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:41:14 +1100, Alex Ghitza <aghitza@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
62 > Bcc-ing myself on every sent message is suboptimal for a number of
\r
63 > reasons: (1) gmail throws away the bcc-ed copy since it has the same
\r
64 > message id as the one sitting in the gmail sent mail, and so the
\r
65 > bcc-ed copy never makes it back to my local mail;
\r
67 I agree it is suboptimal, but are you sure this is true? I send
\r
68 messages via gmail and those having Bcc to me are marked as new and
\r
69 downloaded by the next pass of getmail (via POP).
\r