DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
	:mime-version:content-type;
	b=KvnIxnD+ryIkP66nIi9jbD+Sm5mjxZE5td4hUCGK/DdLIxRb7+DZDnGd2cZuaixD3e
	eyHdAore9VfQmt9c6I5/KBl0Mwg8Eoo7p0lTN2rBlZ7RREF7cWCFDYZH+5nf3m7aJIU+
	4GVO/sUEfPEGPmPXuar9hZHchnNU9+ngTAwkI=
Sender: Jed Brown <five9a2@gmail.com>
From: Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org>
To: Alex Ghitza <aghitza@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
In-Reply-To: <54hbrnpod1.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <54hbrnpod1.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:55:16 -0800
Message-ID: <8763836xnv.fsf@59A2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [notmuch] keeping a copy of sent mail locally
Precedence: list

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:41:14 +1100, Alex Ghitza <aghitza@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bcc-ing myself on every sent message is suboptimal for a number of
> reasons: (1) gmail throws away the bcc-ed copy since it has the same
> message id as the one sitting in the gmail sent mail, and so the
> bcc-ed copy never makes it back to my local mail;

I agree it is suboptimal, but are you sure this is true?  I send
messages via gmail and those having Bcc to me are marked as new and
downloaded by the next pass of getmail (via POP).

Jed