15/1f7e4e2ce729613c137200043188c798c9cf0a

   1 Return-Path: <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F416431FAE\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:13:43 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
   9         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  10         with ESMTP id kgK5oHm3Hf1i for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  11         Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:13:42 -0800 (PST)\r
  12 Received: from mail-bw0-f224.google.com (mail-bw0-f224.google.com\r
  13         [209.85.218.224])\r
  14         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3EA431FBC\r
  15         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:13:42 -0800 (PST)\r
  16 Received: by bwz24 with SMTP id 24so5150871bwz.30\r
  17         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:13:41 -0800 (PST)\r
  18 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  19         h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:to:cc:subject\r
  20         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
  21         bh=nZXi4c+ci4G0yTrXncR4C6n7FErF9l/mOKjjwSycpuk=;\r
  22         b=t1XiuxpNwEN6cgESURbQAE/xd5JtXWBkysiV8CATLA7P9vf0jakrdAvewhSbEwEi0l\r
  23         /TslCDH4PbY2iEZsFEMHwxf1BtPDhi5RDTUb9+zeoUu+0xz1p2CjhOCH8eHYxo1Urazr\r
  24         7xr4Cwh6NJr8pGWsQNw4S7nePlImoP4D+mEr4=\r
  25 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  26         h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id\r
  27         :mime-version:content-type;\r
  28         b=cdHyEqwzRL0BMYSva4bv8hYK6S0ahNIMISo06viU0q2YHvzLTtoiuJkF4vugojWomT\r
  29         LQrNOXZ/ChLz37PugrEfMnmswMgdyelziv8jfQp2TfoNmeZcGYZfDPEi2f+B21lwBhqm\r
  30         t9x2lwXTaOGdVpgAkrOhRAFYpVp5zMeqjTVbI=\r
  31 Received: by 10.204.20.143 with SMTP id f15mr527847bkb.49.1259082821024;\r
  32         Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:13:41 -0800 (PST)\r
  33 Received: from kunyang (vawpc43.ethz.ch [129.132.59.11])\r
  34         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b17sm7413782fka.46.2009.11.24.09.13.38\r
  35         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);\r
  36         Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:13:38 -0800 (PST)\r
  37 Sender: Jed Brown <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
  38 From: Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org>\r
  39 To: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>, Jan Janak <jan@ryngle.com>,\r
  40         Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>\r
  41 In-Reply-To: <yun8wdvop37.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>\r
  42 References: <yun7htkcou6.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>\r
  43         <87639122sx.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <yunhbslpv3q.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>\r
  44         <87bpismx21.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  45         <f35dbb950911240414w14543aacoa57508ea28604e82@mail.gmail.com>\r
  46         <yun8wdvop37.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>\r
  47 Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:14:11 +0100\r
  48 Message-ID: <87zl6byhek.fsf@59A2.org>\r
  49 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
  51 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  52 Subject: Re: [notmuch] notmuch 'index' mode.\r
  53 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  54 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12\r
  55 Precedence: list\r
  56 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  57         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  58 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  59         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  60 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  61 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  62 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  63 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  64         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  65 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:13:43 -0000\r
  66 \r
  67 On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:38:20 -0800, Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> wrote:\r
  68 > A disadvantage I see is that you would not see this 'virtual tags' in\r
  69 > the list of tags on each message.\r
  70 \r
  71 Is it not cheap to check the current search results against the vtags\r
  72 (named searches) that you have defined.  Then you can show them right up\r
  73 there with the real tags.\r
  74 \r
  75 Jed\r