1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB39431FBC
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 00:24:46 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id VkR12Rk6XPXX for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Fri, 7 Dec 2012 00:24:44 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu
\r
19 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2556C431FB6
\r
20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 00:24:44 -0800 (PST)
\r
21 Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
22 by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A192E508C7;
\r
23 Fri, 7 Dec 2012 00:24:41 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new
\r
25 Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-76-166-145-133.socal.res.rr.com
\r
26 [76.166.145.133]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)
\r
27 by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5812E50677;
\r
28 Fri, 7 Dec 2012 00:24:37 -0800 (PST)
\r
29 Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
30 id 29754616EF; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 00:24:37 -0800 (PST)
\r
31 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
32 To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, Peter Feigl <craven@gmx.net>,
\r
33 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
34 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] Use the S-Expression structured printer in
\r
35 notmuch-show, notmuch-reply and notmuch-search.
\r
36 In-Reply-To: <87txry5m08.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
37 References: <cover.1354794428.git.craven@gmx.net>
\r
38 <9cb474a271c471f8bae8b55b0148bb970ba78ceb.1354794428.git.craven@gmx.net>
\r
39 <871uf2in54.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
40 <87txry5m08.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
41 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+143~g175686e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1
\r
42 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
43 Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:24:36 -0800
\r
44 Message-ID: <87mwxqgth7.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
46 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
47 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
48 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
49 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
51 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
52 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
53 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
54 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
55 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
56 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
57 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
58 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
59 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
60 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 08:24:46 -0000
\r
63 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
65 On Fri, Dec 07 2012, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
66 > Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> writes:
\r
68 >> On Thu, Dec 06 2012, Peter Feigl <craven@gmx.net> wrote:
\r
69 >>> - /* Any changes to the JSON format should be reflected in the file
\r
70 >>> - * devel/schemata. */
\r
71 >>> + /* Any changes to the JSON or S-Expression format should be
\r
72 >>> + * reflected in the file devel/schemata. */
\r
74 >> Can we just make these comments more general, so we don't have to tweak
\r
75 >> them every time a new formatter is added?
\r
77 > I think I agree, but I think it may as well wait until we have more than
\r
78 > the two formats. In other words I would suggest not holding up the
\r
79 > (latest version) of this series for this.
\r
81 Yes, that's totally fair. I didn't notice later that a new version of
\r
82 the patch had already been sent.
\r
84 I haven't had a chance to review the patches, but I am certainly all for
\r
85 the feature. Definitely don't hold it up on this account.
\r
90 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
92 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
93 Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
\r
95 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQwafEAAoJEO00zqvie6q87O8P/A80+dLNpZ3M9nDNl9aV1TZW
\r
96 XV6m8wWrDi2pz8FHaZQ4en0Y0dwJ/t2rCCMN2bPEieLZrgm+ktd3LU7jY/pkYBip
\r
97 Q1DJsHw41HiPTz9O0bSremCa2U+GzJ5iXyP/euHnRcm6Q4cppqJDQ8btDWA9zc7Z
\r
98 zg7g24/pXS9DSxwMbFcGnU/aMJWYwr8JtOWEFBaHANeTqd5WdE9uzG6N9q3tSrcI
\r
99 nUqRjqLjI7SVy0u/Rw32j0LsGg8UNIO8zvVuBwHU+dO3AdQI2OUzJVyaP2NFoGXd
\r
100 tV40Qzn3/XQkS6OkIkkwGeJb5UrhpvrrSjaSdfqfj1lAjyYL/vxg4viX/LGR16KP
\r
101 YvN9NldyvKUzgJHfAuO5Lv0FWyWiPiI3ZGoL3xLmHH4A+O/1Ap9HUSfAcVy7/xRJ
\r
102 Yq+JMagdfg0g/whVteEFtTswxbRBWKB7KWQV7k5gNfKQiTPttkNqvZB1odrRu97H
\r
103 s2FqyBhE3y9pOmqqRDcE6KiPfHQLx3KHmkYajqOFHD0u6A0Sr8v+PD/kUfOGFNXz
\r
104 SSPwNwtR2jbm7CLLRhg0Pxdto8v4GxJkG6sLTdc1hk0Du9JBzw6XEBgv31syRJe9
\r
105 kfQBoGbye2ESQ+kfAveXiiD6Jw4kjUFu8W1KaLhdE8rjUeTNPfzVqbcNAnQn4cU0
\r
106 jcf436O/Ljlhm4NlYutJ
\r
108 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r