1 Return-Path: <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2708431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id LgPjxSXq1Idn for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from homiemail-a21.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbbj.dreamhost.com
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D39431FB5
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: from homiemail-a21.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
23 by homiemail-a21.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AAD4300079;
\r
24 Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:subject
\r
26 :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:
\r
27 content-type; q=dns; s=sspaeth.de; b=VKxsNN5qMSHpDTTGdE0Zo35vSdu
\r
28 etYryVTWP1gW1f3TZFroU6EfZRyDSYo+ViNBKeS+D1oPnge4DxSRr8Jzs6YC9ths
\r
29 8bfmyFNQ5vfEZrjBRY9NOa3j3mgwrk2cjSyd5NtMdZ0R0QMbcdS/G9lkTHH0oqwh
\r
31 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to
\r
32 :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:
\r
33 content-type; s=sspaeth.de; bh=bTwMsMecM1ofqKS6DpIjb6JrXIE=; b=c
\r
34 RMXHm/kf/w3BHTa252qkyAvDJP0DXr1S0W2WrqgNVK52qQfolZ30yO56OZ03KS/F
\r
35 rT6FRvVl+UAVvPfXEG2lQsyX2YXbLVPahzMMEB+LA6ibuYpuSmA/ImL7PGR4s7nj
\r
36 OGIdTz3XfqnyN6yyFKmz8fvBc47GgKU2nkr8wqaazA=
\r
37 Received: from spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (unknown [62.48.117.110])
\r
38 (Authenticated sender: fax@sspaeth.de)
\r
39 by homiemail-a21.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B1C46300074;
\r
40 Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
\r
41 Received: by spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
\r
42 Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:01:54 +0200
\r
43 From: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r
44 To: Florian Friesdorf <flo@chaoflow.net>,
\r
45 Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
\r
46 Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
47 Subject: Re: python documentation
\r
48 In-Reply-To: <87hb9v61qy.fsf@eve.chaoflow.net>
\r
49 References: <87hbb4zyp6.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
50 <87pqpsh0sg.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87mxjn68q7.fsf@eve.chaoflow.net>
\r
51 <877har7jcp.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87hb9v61qy.fsf@eve.chaoflow.net>
\r
52 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-133-g9450314 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.50.1
\r
53 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
54 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:01:54 +0200
\r
55 Message-ID: <87oc4257t9.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
57 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
58 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
59 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
60 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
62 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
63 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
64 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
65 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
66 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
67 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
68 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
69 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
70 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
71 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:02:05 -0000
\r
74 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
\r
75 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
77 On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:03:01 +0200, Florian Friesdorf <flo@chaoflow.net> wr=
\r
79 > Is it sane to have python bindings that need updates or would a plain
\r
80 > wrapper of the notmuch script (that maybe needs less updates) be better?
\r
81 > I don't want to imply that this can be answered with yes/no, but more to
\r
82 > get a comparison of the two approaches.
\r
84 Invoking notmuch the script and piping the results? I wouldn't call that
\r
85 python bindings anymore then. Also it is bound to be much more expensive
\r
86 than directly interfacing libnotmuch.so.
\r
88 > Na=C3=AFvely, I imagine there is a header file and the generation of the
\r
89 > python bindings happens rather automagic.
\r
91 I wish it would be that easy. :-)
\r
96 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
98 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
99 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
\r
101 iEYEARECAAYFAk2t6jIACgkQVYX1jMgnoGJJXgCePa9jPr2FS71ZD+uqPo8kij4k
\r
102 6GkAoIYqxHqIsSiW3xNI8xfRE5hNvTuQ
\r
104 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r