Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2708431FB6 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:02:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LgPjxSXq1Idn for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:02:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a21.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbbj.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.119]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D39431FB5 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:02:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a21.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a21.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AAD4300079; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:02:02 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version: content-type; q=dns; s=sspaeth.de; b=VKxsNN5qMSHpDTTGdE0Zo35vSdu etYryVTWP1gW1f3TZFroU6EfZRyDSYo+ViNBKeS+D1oPnge4DxSRr8Jzs6YC9ths 8bfmyFNQ5vfEZrjBRY9NOa3j3mgwrk2cjSyd5NtMdZ0R0QMbcdS/G9lkTHH0oqwh 4d8mviWkNAFQtImk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version: content-type; s=sspaeth.de; bh=bTwMsMecM1ofqKS6DpIjb6JrXIE=; b=c RMXHm/kf/w3BHTa252qkyAvDJP0DXr1S0W2WrqgNVK52qQfolZ30yO56OZ03KS/F rT6FRvVl+UAVvPfXEG2lQsyX2YXbLVPahzMMEB+LA6ibuYpuSmA/ImL7PGR4s7nj OGIdTz3XfqnyN6yyFKmz8fvBc47GgKU2nkr8wqaazA= Received: from spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (unknown [62.48.117.110]) (Authenticated sender: fax@sspaeth.de) by homiemail-a21.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B1C46300074; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:01:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:01:54 +0200 From: Sebastian Spaeth To: Florian Friesdorf , Jameson Rollins , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: python documentation In-Reply-To: <87hb9v61qy.fsf@eve.chaoflow.net> References: <87hbb4zyp6.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87pqpsh0sg.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87mxjn68q7.fsf@eve.chaoflow.net> <877har7jcp.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87hb9v61qy.fsf@eve.chaoflow.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-133-g9450314 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:01:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87oc4257t9.fsf@SSpaeth.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:02:05 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:03:01 +0200, Florian Friesdorf wr= ote: > Is it sane to have python bindings that need updates or would a plain > wrapper of the notmuch script (that maybe needs less updates) be better? > I don't want to imply that this can be answered with yes/no, but more to > get a comparison of the two approaches. Invoking notmuch the script and piping the results? I wouldn't call that python bindings anymore then. Also it is bound to be much more expensive than directly interfacing libnotmuch.so. > Na=C3=AFvely, I imagine there is a header file and the generation of the > python bindings happens rather automagic. I wish it would be that easy. :-) Sebastian --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2t6jIACgkQVYX1jMgnoGJJXgCePa9jPr2FS71ZD+uqPo8kij4k 6GkAoIYqxHqIsSiW3xNI8xfRE5hNvTuQ =P0P3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--