Re: [PATCH] test: "search-by-folder" single-word search terms should be updated corre...

diff --git a/08/967a23638113ac3aa7a49578b374f18106486b b/08/967a23638113ac3aa7a49578b374f18106486b
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..a9dd931
--- /dev/null
+++ b/08/967a23638113ac3aa7a49578b374f18106486b
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA96431FD0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:04:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 1XqlNjp7fda2 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 12 May 2011 09:04:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F6D431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:04:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5EB966E02FE;\r
+       Thu, 12 May 2011 09:04:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-98-149-172-122.socal.res.rr.com\r
+       [98.149.172.122]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06AA66E04B5;\r
+       Thu, 12 May 2011 09:04:08 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by servo.finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 547471F5E; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:04:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: "search-by-folder" single-word search terms should\r
+       be updated correctly when directories are renamed.\r
+In-Reply-To: <8739kk9hpq.fsf@praet.org>\r
+References: <87tyh9wzs2.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <878vyjya2n.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
+       <87vd1n4rd2.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
+       <877hc3x5td.fsf@A7GMS.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>\r
+       <8739kk9hpq.fsf@praet.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 09:04:06 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87fwojhpmx.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 16:04:17 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Thu, 12 May 2011 15:22:25 +0200, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:\r
+> I've pushed a cleaner version of this patch to my github repo, for\r
+> inclusion in release-candidate/0.6.\r
+\r
+Hey, Pieter.  I realize we've been passing around git urls a lot\r
+recently, particularly in regards to the release-candidate/0.6 branch,\r
+but I think we should try to retain the habit of sending all patches to\r
+the list if we can.\r
+\r
+In general, I think we should try to only use git branches when:\r
+\r
+- compiling existing patch series for review.\r
+- new patch series that are so long that sending them to the list would\r
+  be cumbersome.\r
+\r
+I've been bad about this myself, since I was pushing patches to the\r
+r-c/0.6 branch, but I think in general we should try to avoid that.\r
+It's nice to have all patches on the list, so everyone can easily review\r
+them and publicly comment on them.\r
+\r
+Thanks!\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNzAT2AAoJEO00zqvie6q8+9MP/3TVPxwpeunQ0mzeN++g9QyY\r
+Zu9co0KN+IHTM4kDluf5doQvsd21jSjHKj/i/miTBDPGOVTCmETjL5FFJ6ie+mz1\r
+8s36S17Zb+Du+xp7AxK1rATKK/iurUImw3uk7/oGkCxfLShkIBIzc2eDFAX452T2\r
+upjHj2/kPpDX4LSB/ybrjEOS0CW+ubkgnpqPptfQFaRuuR8dAiBDja9DLzzwm61A\r
+wMYmzyscIVYOXI06kFxi/1f3CDe8oqfdUkrfvLkoFxskxhugginSeqRWDt7fw7MI\r
+O0Gwe0D15R8pTxqovP8FpmsRQJobLZbv4JMfINQOZabERG6Mqx9kr3R+ZC8c1iJO\r
+W61yrRPIS2iALcwsVOsretiJSrz5EG/p6srfwHMLzLCJp7kbNoDBPKk6cncVd38B\r
+BRKEc/oN+RUb+LTVbDE13k7SjHitayEdoJ7BqzkpYS9WlHhzQ20/KygRv5E4vnNa\r
+ykURI3avnSPuYoguapn7ipU2DbTGqyP95eVCBS7t4S6usHmm6zdPK98onoXTyLe/\r
+Ma9tElXnLzrcjNZnsU+tuLDS/bpD6l5nTsDa08JtoamlVeiBzEzFhlluSLcHZhYI\r
+PgCJ9MpVHlzjbvLbqSLgkex8ilJ2a/mvbxAVTvww1L+m1XJ9WrntF1xwovRirveQ\r
+XP1Cu57RFLbbsC6YZ95Z\r
+=RtTQ\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r