Re: [PATCH 4/4] timegm: add portable implementation (Solaris support)

diff --git a/f3/2ce3c886e170de8087eac2cf4312d6705e55f7 b/f3/2ce3c886e170de8087eac2cf4312d6705e55f7
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..d056bdc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/f3/2ce3c886e170de8087eac2cf4312d6705e55f7
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+Return-Path: <blakej@foo.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F4C431E62\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:29:46 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id XRV5cgdr9kRA for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:29:38 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from foo.net (70-36-235-136.dsl.static.sonic.net [70.36.235.136])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB2B6431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:29:37 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from foo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by foo.net (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7KGTR78027224;\r
+       Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:29:27 -0700 (PDT)\r
+To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] timegm: add portable implementation (Solaris support)\r
+In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:03:42 +0300."\r
+       <m2bo4sfixt.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi> \r
+Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:29:27 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <27223.1377016167@foo.net>\r
+From: Blake Jones <blakej@foo.net>\r
+X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2\r
+       (foo.net [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:29:27 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Vladimir Marek <vlmarek@volny.cz>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:29:46 -0000\r
+\r
+> The copyright header gives FSF "owner"ship to the file -- which would\r
+> be fine by the project -- but does assigning copyright to the FSF work\r
+> like this...  ... I started to look around and found (among other\r
+> pages) this:\r
+> \r
+> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=blob;f=doc/Copyright/conditions.text;h=6e19adf0233900c9169\r
+> e10fe7e0aa8d1feb73996;hb=HEAD\r
+> \r
+> Maybe for liability reasons FSF needs more than just stating the\r
+> copyright at the beginning of file... I don't know -- but if this is\r
+> the case maybe the easiest thing is to remove (amend) the Copyright\r
+> line out of the file.\r
+\r
+I don't really care what sort of copyright it has.  Vladimir is the one\r
+with the up-to-date tree at this point, so he would be best positioned\r
+to update the text with whatever works best for the rest of notmuch.\r
+\r
+> In getline.c, and getdelim.c the code is taken from glibc. What I've \r
+> understood this timegm.c is new art ?\r
+\r
+To the best of my recollection, yes, I implemented this version of\r
+timegm() from scratch, based on my understanding of what it needed to\r
+do.\r
+\r
+Blake\r