1 Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52757431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 03:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id 5Frn45eAwqoK for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Thu, 29 Mar 2012 03:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])
\r
18 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBDBC431FAE
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 03:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: from fctnnbsc30w-142166230117.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net
\r
23 ([142.166.230.117] helo=zancas.localnet)
\r
24 by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
\r
25 (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
\r
26 id 1SDCgj-0002Nu-W9; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:34:42 -0300
\r
27 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77)
\r
28 (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
\r
29 id 1SDCgJ-0005Ug-Mf; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:34:15 -0300
\r
30 From: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>
\r
31 To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
\r
32 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
33 Subject: Re: [Joerg Jaspert] Bug#666027: notmuch: get a quiet option
\r
34 In-Reply-To: <87vcloshss.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
35 References: <87ty19pi85.fsf@zancas.localnet>User-Agent:
\r
36 Notmuch/0.12+75~gb2dcc3c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
37 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) <87vcloshss.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
38 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
39 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
40 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:34:15 -0300
\r
41 Message-ID: <87limjpufs.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
45 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
46 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
48 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
49 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
50 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
51 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
52 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
53 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
54 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
55 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
56 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
57 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:34:46 -0000
\r
59 On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:26:43 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
\r
60 > Should we subscribe the Debian BTS to the list (and the list to the
\r
61 > Debian notmuch BTS), so that the list will just get all the bug reports
\r
68 We could give it a try and see how it works. I suspect it needs the
\r
69 assistance of one of the notmuch list moderators (which I understand we
\r
70 have delegates for as of a few days ago) to get the BTS able to send to
\r
71 the list. Any Debian savvy volunteers to sort this out?
\r