1 Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98AB8431FC0
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 03:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id befBQ-6d40V4 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Mon, 24 Sep 2012 03:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])
\r
18 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A6FC431FAF
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 03:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net
\r
23 ([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet)
\r
24 by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa
\r
25 (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72)
\r
26 (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
\r
27 id 1TG694-0004JF-0P; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 07:44:10 -0300
\r
28 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80)
\r
29 (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
\r
30 id 1TG68y-0008Sx-J2; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 07:44:04 -0300
\r
31 From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
\r
32 To: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
33 Subject: Re: RFC: Annotate internal_error with the attribute noreturn 2nd
\r
36 <1348482717-10340-1-git-send-email-4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
\r
37 References: <20120922161256.GE26662@mit.edu>
\r
38 <1348482717-10340-1-git-send-email-4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
\r
39 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.1.1
\r
40 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
41 Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 07:44:04 -0300
\r
42 Message-ID: <873927hf9n.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
44 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
46 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
47 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
49 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
50 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
51 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
52 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
53 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
54 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
55 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
56 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
57 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
58 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:44:11 -0000
\r
60 Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> writes:
\r
62 > We need to discuss where those kind of macro definitions abstracting
\r
63 > away compiler differences should go. None of the files in util
\r
64 > includes notmuch-private.h, so I was unsure whether it's okay to put
\r
67 How about a new header file in util/
\r
69 function-attributes.h or something like that?
\r
71 The util stuff is "lower level" than lib/ so it makes sense to me to put
\r