1 Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@nixu.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCAE7431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:02:56 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id rnAe+GrXWJyf for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:02:56 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail-gw3.nixu.fi (mail-gw3.nixu.fi [193.209.237.7])
\r
18 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14DD1431FAE
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:02:55 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: from pps.filterd (mail-gw3 [127.0.0.1])
\r
23 by mail-gw3.nixu.fi (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id q0KAxMlU015432;
\r
24 Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:02:52 +0200
\r
25 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31])
\r
26 by mail-gw3.nixu.fi with ESMTP id 114cs1a8r6-1
\r
27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
\r
28 Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:02:52 +0200
\r
29 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31])
\r
30 by taco2.nixu.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id
\r
31 q0KB2pk8024525; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:02:51 +0200
\r
32 From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
33 To: Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
34 Subject: Re: Updated remote script
\r
35 In-Reply-To: <87fwfbwi2h.fsf@jhu.edu>
\r
36 References: <87k44n8xtr.fsf@jhu.edu> <yf6sjjba8ep.fsf@taco2.nixu.fi>
\r
37 <87fwfbwi2h.fsf@jhu.edu>
\r
38 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+71~gefa5d6c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
40 X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL
\r
41 $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F
\r
42 !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z
\r
43 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:02:51 +0200
\r
44 Message-ID: <yf6hazqab6s.fsf@taco2.nixu.fi>
\r
46 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
47 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.6.7361,
\r
48 1.0.211, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-01-20_02:2012-01-20, 2012-01-20,
\r
49 1970-01-01 signatures=0
\r
50 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0
\r
51 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0
\r
52 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0
\r
54 scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1201200049
\r
55 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
56 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
58 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
59 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
61 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
62 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
63 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
64 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
65 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
66 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
67 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:02:57 -0000
\r
69 On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:31:02 -0500, Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu> wrote:
\r
72 > On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:50:38 +0200, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote:
\r
73 > > Quick comments: "/tmp/notmuch_dtach.socket" is dangerous (and the _ssh).
\r
76 > > make directory /tmp/notmuch_`id -u`
\r
77 > > and chmod it to 0700
\r
78 > > and make sure you own it and it has right permissions.
\r
80 > > make directory for these sockets in $HOME and chmod that to 700
\r
82 > > just drop the socket in $HOME/.ssh (which should already be
\r
85 > Thanks very much for that. I made some quick changes, based on your
\r
86 > first suggestion above. I'm pretty sure the checks are not in the most
\r
87 > optimal order, but it seemed worth getting the changes up.
\r
91 > As always, of course, anyone is more than welcome to change and improve
\r
92 > the version up there. I was mainly changing it just to get my last
\r
93 > error-ridden version out of circulation.
\r
95 I'll probably play with that in (far ;) future...
\r
101 Thanks, good script!
\r