1 Return-Path: <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F56431FBD
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:51:07 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7]
\r
15 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
16 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
17 with ESMTP id LkuBT-aLrYTx for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
18 Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:51:06 -0800 (PST)
\r
19 Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com
\r
20 [209.85.212.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
21 (No client certificate requested)
\r
22 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC1EB431FB6
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:51:06 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 Received: by mail-vb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id fc21so4864275vbb.26
\r
25 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:51:05 -0800 (PST)
\r
26 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
27 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
\r
28 bh=9JVbuiFzWIr2N7MabL0rR+K/11XvNdJ9f/CfHapmZH8=;
\r
29 b=CwbkU4fjG3usHG9IbQRG128jM+b8DXvJY73UwToCIyvnPybxwpJ1tCeECfUbL72J0D
\r
30 IKhZlhT7BVzDi/w/MqRWpriwRFrUQGK25mZevt/eLQ+cn5CEJ5adnOaZLHCMcR42ITIy
\r
31 zLItxL2xaX7fHzzNK4RJvT9CPiQ8eUsHAvfzCnvQMkmbqfNl2DdmhEFkO8DOZUiaumKn
\r
32 jyYurWZzrgC8aG+vZVyqaWQQ6HXYBLooN044RmRBBglX1q/zHo5gEufSHeDcGX1xcKNB
\r
33 dvxe/TIUJfieNQxYgtE+fMdLxfMJlIoRyrBHFcHYXb09htP86PA5VzyXJsisRHIr87HX
\r
35 Received: by 10.220.220.5 with SMTP id hw5mr16968905vcb.53.1353293464930; Sun,
\r
36 18 Nov 2012 18:51:04 -0800 (PST)
\r
38 Received: by 10.220.247.209 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:50:44 -0800 (PST)
\r
39 From: Ethan <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com>
\r
40 Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:50:44 -0500
\r
42 <CAOJ+Ob2Fha8n_ZretgesHgiB2UgTKiNh-cwxQ-_NGw=CkX7Wzw@mail.gmail.com>
\r
43 Subject: emacs's function special form
\r
44 To: Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>
\r
45 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9cfcc02410a3104ced030a9
\r
46 Cc: notmuch mailing list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
47 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
48 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
50 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
51 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
52 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
53 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
54 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
55 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
56 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
57 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
58 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
59 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 02:51:07 -0000
\r
61 --14dae9cfcc02410a3104ced030a9
\r
62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
\r
63 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
65 On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
67 > 2012ko azaroak 18an, Ethan Glasser-Camp-ek idatzi zuen:
\r
69 > > - You might want to use #' on lambdas.
\r
71 > This is actually unnecessary =96 as the info node "(elisp) Anonymous
\r
72 > Functions" says, the forms with and without #' are equivalent. The
\r
73 > current notmuch style is not to have #' on lambdas (that is, there are 0
\r
74 > instances of #'(lambda ...) in the code base). IMO that=92s correct:
\r
75 > the unnecessary #' is just line-noise-ish.
\r
78 OK, I think I understand. Thanks for the clarification. I found that info
\r
79 node very confusing.
\r
81 It says that #' has effects "assuming function-object is a valid lambda
\r
82 expression". So why put #' on variables that are the names of functions?
\r
84 In fact, outside names of functions, when are you supposed to use #' at all=
\r
89 --14dae9cfcc02410a3104ced030a9
\r
90 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
\r
91 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
93 <div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Aaron Ecay <spa=
\r
94 n dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:aaronecay@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">=
\r
95 aaronecay@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quo=
\r
96 te" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"=
\r
99 2012ko azaroak 18an, Ethan Glasser-Camp-ek idatzi zuen:<br>
\r
100 <div class=3D"im">><br>
\r
101 > - You might want to use #' on lambdas.<br>
\r
103 </div>This is actually unnecessary =96 as the info node "(elisp) Anony=
\r
105 Functions" says, the forms with and without #' are equivalent. =A0=
\r
107 current notmuch style is not to have #' on lambdas (that is, there are =
\r
109 instances of #'(lambda ...) in the code base). =A0IMO that=92s correct:=
\r
111 the unnecessary #' is just line-noise-ish.<br></blockquote><div><br>OK,=
\r
112 I think I understand. Thanks for the clarification. I found that info node=
\r
113 very confusing.<br><br>It says that #' has effects "assuming func=
\r
114 tion-object is a valid lambda expression". So why put #' on variab=
\r
115 les that are the names of functions?<br>
\r
117 <br>In fact, outside names of functions, when are you supposed to use #'=
\r
118 ; at all?<br><br>Ethan<br><br></div></div>
\r
120 --14dae9cfcc02410a3104ced030a9--
\r