1 Return-Path: <mpn@google.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A79431FBC
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:48:01 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7]
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id RAxcU7AGtyTT for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:48:00 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com
\r
19 [74.125.83.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client
\r
20 certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
\r
21 3CAFB431FAE for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:48:00 -0800
\r
23 Received: by mail-ee0-f53.google.com with SMTP id c50so8759842eek.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:47:59 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com;
\r
26 s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:organization:references
\r
27 :user-agent:x-face:face:x-pgp:x-pgp-fp:date:message-id:mime-version
\r
28 :content-type; bh=1kz0qEXiYI1QStca4aye16F1QNDmy7Q6poIN5yC9we0=;
\r
29 b=bYW3fF0k6HJ+R/6LDJ3eEk0Vmua1U7ni+RsxRL98E2BejZpyiJVe9jMVsQSoa82pYO
\r
30 qcggJ5cd0ziUDZcInrGTIn5kp+NK55EAKXLUWfcpap0/08ChwbnEP3gM4tBcHg+qR8+X
\r
31 vxBNGSjFh506Pu0hMyirKrdSITIhmL7Yhj7VsnNjnATZ98CbZs+G57EgdfhVMhPVY/qT
\r
32 V0yHxsQy6WFsFmWd5eSrZDm5yzR3HPsFvmehCZ7CVtdK+b1R2nD3luNDTavzfznzRsjI
\r
33 IKwSS7n74IKIzOzFYk1Bi5XhZWIKQ+KM4TvvowbKjJeN6wFOsEz8o0qci9E6O6NxoaVN P+hQ==
\r
34 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
35 d=google.com; s=20120113;
\r
36 h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:organization:references
\r
37 :user-agent:x-face:face:x-pgp:x-pgp-fp:date:message-id:mime-version
\r
38 :content-type:x-gm-message-state;
\r
39 bh=1kz0qEXiYI1QStca4aye16F1QNDmy7Q6poIN5yC9we0=;
\r
40 b=RltgPHPYV93EiG3luIwd7LSvx9jJAOwD/5TTww7vbKVp0xZBG3959e9Q2F5E84UlaP
\r
41 IjDxlTylKV+jciLs2GyCwgZeYMHgqRzUwP8l8Sa7tKMNy7RqJFyNIeNHPG4/X5ecZXia
\r
42 2KGMdkKVG3Xer13rYZuQHJxEuwDZocViA3pNXLAm95E2LYGfSABzJNBh0kTrWV1suU2f
\r
43 znxEzR0VHm822a0AiOIhw3a4zr7F1/lT6bfgJQ02QQZh39cNAbWs9iDTN5hBseSTWVKH
\r
44 tioVNknsuwkWWFHFbMPXsxCrp1WIy8+Ba7r9lWZ8tJVVBlrmsBdlxY7vaBKer+qECoD7
\r
46 Received: by 10.14.175.198 with SMTP id z46mr72382687eel.26.1354128478937;
\r
47 Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:47:58 -0800 (PST)
\r
48 Received: from mpn-glaptop ([2620:0:105f:5:9157:c8bf:b215:a515])
\r
49 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q2sm48716517eem.13.2012.11.28.10.47.57
\r
50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
51 Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:47:58 -0800 (PST)
\r
52 Sender: Michal Nazarewicz <mpn@google.com>
\r
53 From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
\r
54 To: Jeremy Nickurak <not-much@trk.nickurak.ca>,
\r
55 notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
56 Subject: Re: gmail label support in offlineimap - update
\r
58 <CA+eQo_0wOSjHoMK30_PwGZonBNbSDCRy+ghX-TnimfZp++8cBg@mail.gmail.com>
\r
59 Organization: http://mina86.com/
\r
60 References: <50B62409.7050706@gmail.com>
\r
61 <CA+eQo_0wOSjHoMK30_PwGZonBNbSDCRy+ghX-TnimfZp++8cBg@mail.gmail.com>
\r
62 User-Agent: Notmuch/ (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.50.1
\r
63 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
\r
64 X-Face: PbkBB1w#)bOqd`iCe"Ds{e+!C7`pkC9a|f)Qo^BMQvy\q5x3?vDQJeN(DS?|-^$uMti[3D*#^_Ts"pU$jBQLq~Ud6iNwAw_r_o_4]|JO?]}P_}Nc&"p#D(ZgUb4uCNPe7~a[DbPG0T~!&c.y$Ur,=N4RT>]dNpd; KFrfMCylc}gc??'U2j,!8%xdD
\r
65 Face: 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
\r
67 X-PGP-FP: AC1F 5F5C D418 88F8 CC84 5858 2060 4012 5075 1FF4
\r
68 Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:47:52 +0100
\r
69 Message-ID: <xa1tlidllg2v.fsf@mina86.com>
\r
71 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
\r
72 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnChfhr9mIAVTo77V5k9M6zg5EAx/6Eb+vjNkoVk2iRwe62bq09FaJxJ1fHphCJA2cBYtIJS1B87y0Y0AUKzKOzXm9oQnyCFXPb4BRm7HLuSiH2NO67Fc3y7OTCD35bA03nyOV7FLrQrAe9NzuoiHjRZ1fql1fesVSa2uImPX8mO6UvFGI1xDowRFTMBaV+MxmfT4O0A9WH0S/uKZ6ULMhs0fql6w==
\r
73 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
74 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
76 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
77 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
78 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
79 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
80 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
81 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
82 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
83 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
84 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
85 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:48:01 -0000
\r
88 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
\r
89 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
91 On Wed, Nov 28 2012, Jeremy Nickurak wrote:
\r
92 > The other direction sounds like it would be trickier though, since
\r
93 > there's no obvious way to say "what notmuch tags have changed since
\r
94 > time X?". Is this something that notmuch could provide?
\r
96 One could parse the X-Labels header and compare it with actual tags
\r
97 given message has. If there are some tags that X-Labels lists but the
\r
98 message does not have, the notmuch->gmail syncing tool could assume that
\r
99 those were removed by notmuch. Similarly with tags that are not in
\r
100 X-Labels but the message has. (Of course the list of tags would have to
\r
101 be limited to those that have corresponding gmail labels.) Just
\r
106 .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=3D./ `o
\r
107 ..o | Computer Science, Micha=C5=82 =E2=80=9Cmina86=E2=80=9D Nazarewicz =
\r
109 ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@google.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
\r
111 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==-=-=";
\r
112 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
115 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
119 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
121 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
122 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
\r
124 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQtlxYAAoJECBgQBJQdR/0O/wP/2g28eReFAQ2qPj4J8rOOsIP
\r
125 nS2R2+EQ6BNYHfGxPnS3sl/qWuxmMYMJKGUNw1mOgPt3k96wagHSJjf2YnC83MOe
\r
126 lm5xnd1OvJKinFRSGITuOHBbSHyQQJ1PMVhBpGIe4usypDDyThaetVrwnxYn/TUJ
\r
127 QYHcRY1cDe+iCzwBBczL9Rm+aZYTz7vct453B5zjdz1o/NnNamAsAHMcJk8p8VR6
\r
128 haH4Jx+wfR1Wp0pzAdJMYZXhRevGQRvvjIzRDAAVnhpxwDZaq3D7eNAy+GrnzlYP
\r
129 BZ4N7aNwV7aQS+2PsbsDzSG3liVAgBCOaj8PyyeCoMCsVASzXH5QDkO4ATdfmjU2
\r
130 NqqV+qJPEvqyYGLJRj53f+ngYOpxdsQNQxgtGRfpJsRPCcbXbRpy3bG+98DlGsfs
\r
131 ALeVXTMpRubPqyNouLBOKidK0J9JGmLEKktapKKsNOqT7z/iHEqICBWlD7q/gR55
\r
132 hflbE3ha0frIJf2RESNMKO11J829X/29y+NKYfSEE2kxDlHs6mAW5QZgd/PewVVq
\r
133 9AT9+7rYVWEIN0JfKitnT251WIvI2Ot7HI8sBdRXybLx9Yb+KSjjkrOwmJRPpM1U
\r
134 zVfJP4VHHwMUjl7kpdpiG5ZAr2ajNPfGslxYDtPQFpp3GMijXdmwFOTYDa+tbntS
\r
135 rCFeWfF6u2YqZeVpMztD
\r
137 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r