1 Return-Path: <novalazy@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1AE1431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 01:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id nn246AbxbId0 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Wed, 4 Jul 2012 01:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A209F431FAE
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 01:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by pbbrr13 with SMTP id rr13so13319298pbb.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references
\r
27 :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition
\r
28 :content-transfer-encoding;
\r
29 bh=Tx0Ceeu51/tA59K/OKJ3w6/z5tceQjfdTz+xpfGQZkw=;
\r
30 b=vT1znrPQlgAjWhr29KEIs2OEQGgjsg9trGEJXei1ewXY57+y9pPs8nCxvsaq3nKuWl
\r
31 OXM03TFj9uJu0AAEvZz8ThnXduQt5SvhfgmXnLdkIlUgpSqxuSSbD6GH306El/rc24nC
\r
32 wxiCJbTnkUL5aFN7G7rrz9vTqOV5HiNqpXVa4kbpoGVgES7R99kKo1CuJi7gL+1sqoLJ
\r
33 YsIEjX3KOhHqslsp6pJ6DWlY3LXPvubdqBea9DrjxqIUXW32VHYTrqEYw9xYgmrZZSbD
\r
34 1gyAfmj0B4qTqYeGZOTxcXEwKW9ZVQq118g/TJGGagfDwJ+/pwsQn/bZfXjmmmefbsQg
\r
36 Received: by 10.68.219.162 with SMTP id pp2mr16139802pbc.85.1341390305602;
\r
37 Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
\r
38 Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au.
\r
40 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id iv8sm17276798pbc.53.2012.07.04.01.25.02
\r
41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
42 Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
\r
43 Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 18:24:59 +1000
\r
44 Message-ID: <20120704182459.GI2342@hili.localdomain>
\r
45 From: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>
\r
46 To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
47 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers
\r
48 In-Reply-To: <87pq8c6zad.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
49 References: <1340508470-16606-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>
\r
50 <1340508470-16606-2-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>
\r
51 <87vci471tw.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
52 <20120704115951.GC2342@hili.localdomain>
\r
53 <87pq8c6zad.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
\r
56 Content-Disposition: inline
\r
57 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
\r
58 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
59 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
60 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
62 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
63 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
64 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
65 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
66 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
67 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
68 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
69 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
70 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
71 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 08:25:11 -0000
\r
73 On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 19:22:18 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
\r
74 > On Tue, Jul 03 2012, Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
75 > > I want to see what the sender intended, before hitting reply.
\r
77 > Given that there have been requests to see a lot of other headers as
\r
78 > well, we probably need to have a discussion about which ones are worth
\r
79 > of emitting, and how we give the user some more general control to see
\r
80 > the ones they want. Either that or we just emit them all?
\r
82 If we start with the obvious:
\r
84 notmuch show --output-headers=date,from,subject,to,cc,reply-to ...
\r
86 with the default being the current set.
\r
88 Emitting everything would be easier but seems wasteful. I just looked
\r
89 at a random message: in RFC822 syntax the header is 4073 bytes, and the
\r
90 body is 1116 bytes. Keeping only the fields that notmuch emits reduces
\r
91 the header to 295 bytes. Reply-To is 92 bytes, but not every message
\r