1 Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD436DE141E
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.236 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.160,
\r
12 SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, URIBL_SBL=0.644, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id 9nv1c-m1xwEF for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34])
\r
18 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770CC6DE0B26
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
\r
20 Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1])
\r
21 by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476D11000CA;
\r
22 Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:37:22 +0300 (EEST)
\r
23 From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
24 To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,
\r
25 David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
26 Subject: Re: [PATCH] cli/lib: remove support for GMime 2.4
\r
27 In-Reply-To: <874mjygvyb.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
\r
28 References: <1439739201-11068-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>
\r
29 <m2k2sv2enz.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi> <874mjygvyb.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
\r
30 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+61~g1eba370 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
31 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
\r
32 X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL
\r
33 $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F
\r
34 !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z
\r
35 Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:37:22 +0300
\r
36 Message-ID: <m2k2su6yst.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
38 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
39 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
40 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
\r
42 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
43 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
44 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
45 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
46 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
\r
47 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
48 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
49 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
50 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
51 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:38:57 -0000
\r
53 On Mon, Aug 17 2015, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
\r
55 > On Sun 2015-08-16 21:53:36 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
\r
56 >> On Sun, Aug 16 2015, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
\r
58 >>> It's becoming a maintenance burden to do anything things with the
\r
59 >>> crypto glue code twice, once for 2.4 and once for 2.6. I don't have
\r
60 >>> any 2.4 version available to test on my development machine anymore,
\r
61 >>> so the 2.4 specific code paths are likely not very well tested.
\r
64 >>> I started to rebase the SMIME signature verification patches and got
\r
65 >>> aggravated at solving the same conflicts twice in every file.
\r
67 >>> 2.6.7 is from 2012, so that's a bit newer than some of our
\r
68 >>> requirements, but I think not so bad. YMMV.
\r
70 >> Perhaps it is time for me to update to gmime 2.6 in this machine. PITA ;/
\r
72 > Please do, i think gmime 2.4 is really not well-supported upstream any
\r
75 Hmm, it seems I've been using gmime 2.6(.17 -- now updated to .20) a long
\r
76 time already -- just that `make distclean` does not see that and I've
\r
77 been looking that part in my build script...
\r
79 Interestingly when David's changes are pushed I have to edit the distclean
\r
80 part of my build to find new gmime so it can do that (distclean, that is)
\r
83 IMO it is somewhat akward that `make distclean` executes `./configure`
\r
84 but that is probably something no-one wants to do anything with...
\r