1 Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B30431FBF;
\r
6 Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:27:09 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
8 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
9 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
10 with ESMTP id AE5vFlhXPRUX; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:27:08 -0800 (PST)
\r
11 Received: from cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
12 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554AC431FAE;
\r
13 Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:27:08 -0800 (PST)
\r
14 From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
15 To: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>
\r
16 In-Reply-To: <1258653555.13952.13.camel@rover>
\r
17 References: <1258630481-5133-1-git-send-email-jan@ryngle.com>
\r
18 <1258630481-5133-2-git-send-email-jan@ryngle.com>
\r
19 <f35dbb950911190352q2dcd041fr83a2f722f3231f44@mail.gmail.com>
\r
20 <87lji2bmrb.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <1258653555.13952.13.camel@rover>
\r
21 Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:26:57 +0100
\r
22 Message-ID: <87k4xmavn2.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
25 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
26 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH 2/2] notmuch list: A new command to produce
\r
28 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
29 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
\r
31 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
32 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
33 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
34 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
35 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
36 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
37 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
38 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
39 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
40 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:27:09 -0000
\r
42 On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:59:13 -0700, Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com> wrote:
\r
43 > I've been pondering approaches to prioritizing the pool of unread
\r
44 > messages. Most of my thinking so far is along the lines of the ability
\r
45 > to automatically apply tags to new messages on various criteria combined
\r
46 > with the ability to manipulate the order in which tags are presented in
\r
47 > a view like what you're describing.
\r
49 Yes. There's definitely a lot of room for experimenting here to figure
\r
50 out how to make things work.
\r
52 > For better or worse, with about 45k messages hitting my inbox per year
\r
53 > *after* most of the list traffic gets peeled off and fed to a private
\r
54 > NNTP server, it's not about reading all of my email any more... it's
\r
55 > about finding and reading the stuff that actually matters *to me*.
\r
57 I totally understand that, (even if I've got an order of magnitude less
\r
58 of non-list mail coming to me). And I hope we can figure out how to support
\r
61 > Can't tell you how excited I am about what's happening here!
\r
63 Thanks so much. And it's a pleasure to have you as part of the community
\r
64 here. I'll look forward to your input.
\r