1 Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951F4431FD5
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 6 May 2014 02:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id WcyP78j7xWQI for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 6 May 2014 02:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com
\r
18 [74.125.82.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9E68431FCB
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 6 May 2014 02:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id w61so1802483wes.12
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 06 May 2014 02:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
25 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
\r
26 h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent
\r
27 :from:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 bh=sI1964qqBWp0UTFHpgv4KmEW76wIFexOTCdRH4yH184=;
\r
29 b=WLSgV6SMVV0sZ2Cmw9DXpBWF+M0B23JAaw+awZcpjpE6eTBv8j5xNZi31SdA2uV7Rp
\r
30 /7pQ09U3mbRWNjSbeXgTBdA/wR1f/Uym5BG4ofr9Fhm/zHB5IPmaqs0zqXBMuw5llB19
\r
31 1SeJzuX2cXLoi7qTWKE2n0j44t2E7YfpPblflzlPE0rqUiVuoRsDCHIzhG22VW6WCQrs
\r
32 AEXyjILFbFhANHI8RgTzXeEn3JV9ACvepss9M/q3bbFJjojNNkmHYBaNfGLjRlNZY9sj
\r
33 vndY37OrJ4De0YE0bZXbrG2hUIfwYh7oIm0MIDSBdm5/1so6TerAKSF/1DKDFLU2OOBV
\r
36 ALoCoQlRnwQMfMDnV1DRye+GJwoDhups8fXBuIYNTpP4Zbse9g3uf5rJbpuQZ+ezP8rTFEEo063l
\r
37 X-Received: by 10.180.14.72 with SMTP id n8mr1560444wic.53.1399369242466;
\r
38 Tue, 06 May 2014 02:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
\r
39 Received: from localhost (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net. [81.149.164.25])
\r
40 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n5sm23561454wiz.1.2014.05.06.02.40.39
\r
41 for <multiple recipients>
\r
42 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
\r
43 Tue, 06 May 2014 02:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
\r
44 To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
45 Subject: Re: precedence in `notmuch-search-line-faces'
\r
46 In-Reply-To: <87mwey3spc.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
47 References: <cunmwf0h1q7.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
48 <87mwey3spc.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
49 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18~rc1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
51 From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
\r
52 Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 10:40:30 +0100
\r
53 Message-ID: <cun8uqffdo1.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
55 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
56 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
57 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
58 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
60 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
61 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
62 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
63 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
64 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
65 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
66 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
67 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
68 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
69 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 09:40:49 -0000
\r
72 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
74 On Sun, May 04 2014, Mark Walters wrote:
\r
75 > I have a slight preference for making it do the comment (ie reverse the
\r
76 > list). My reason is that we have some other cases such as
\r
77 > notmuch-tag-format that apply the first match, so users might be used to
\r
78 > having the specific first and the more general later.
\r
80 That makes sense. Patch follows.
\r
83 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
\r
85 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
88 iKYEARECAGYFAlNorg9fFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
\r
89 bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDc1M0Y5NDJDMEExNjc3MDE4OURGMUYyMDY5
\r
90 RUNEMEFCRjA0OTY1MTYACgkQaezQq/BJZRbS+wCgifAH2cwnoJ1FaCvF1AvwHE2c
\r
91 Lw4An0w/TMuHJZcnTj3lRMKilqJQN2VN
\r
93 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r