1 Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3976431FC2;
\r
6 Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:27:18 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
8 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
9 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
10 with ESMTP id 1KCQqNzQlMTM; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:27:18 -0800 (PST)
\r
11 Received: from cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
12 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3EEB431FAE;
\r
13 Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:27:17 -0800 (PST)
\r
14 From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
15 To: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>, Adrian Perez <aperez@igalia.com>,
\r
16 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
17 In-Reply-To: <yuneinppubn.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
\r
18 References: <1258937675-31405-1-git-send-email-aperez@igalia.com>
\r
19 <87d439g6za.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <yuneinppubn.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
\r
20 Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:27:04 -0800
\r
21 Message-ID: <874oohrvk7.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
23 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
24 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] ANSI escapes in "new" only when output is a
\r
26 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
27 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
\r
29 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
30 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
31 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
32 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
33 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
34 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
35 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
36 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
37 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
38 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:27:18 -0000
\r
40 On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:35:24 -0800, Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> wrote:
\r
41 > Tracking directory mtime instead of just looking at the read-only bit
\r
42 > would let us skip directories that haven't seen any change in content.
\r
44 We've had directory mtime for a long time. I added the check for the
\r
45 read-only bit afterwards to be able to avoid stats on a whole directory
\r
46 hierarchy, (since mtime doesn't propagate upward of course).
\r
48 > Tracking directory contents would let us easily detect name changes
\r
49 > (add/remove/rename).
\r
51 Do we want git tree objects for the directories? ...
\r