1 Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185A5431FC7
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 23:16:57 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id WMRcfpOGEx9W for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Sun, 30 Nov 2014 23:16:46 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com (mail-wg0-f46.google.com
\r
19 [74.125.82.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client
\r
20 certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
\r
21 672E2431FBC for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 23:16:44 -0800
\r
23 Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id a1so5079388wgh.33
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 23:16:43 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
26 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
\r
27 h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent
\r
28 :from:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
29 bh=YM42i2QkzRKtijIVsvTPjxiszLSlk9j+YDWZSq1a/rg=;
\r
30 b=IawulqYuidyan+iC2VaIj2UaMzO/DIpCcWV23zxMSlLgJX1a6NdfbLNgRacyCP1Jq/
\r
31 /ctlurcxNUMigbI4RlwvhmgVhfByQBXt4ZPHiHVNCw9mgcFMyxTJVH2v4If9u6vkuard
\r
32 WuZ2AHhUKru2aZpnSOuIo3i8EroYC1zUxHZB/CvSBHL3kOlpXo7zcacU/0JhsZjHL9p3
\r
33 FiGLj4qbB0nHpITK5blMKVt860+rZP9MdPvk5Hwwr+CGKnJXfOIpS4kgSlgFbbKbOwXH
\r
34 QrBj8ZRNfGLv1FMhKM5Dqk90/QElGUWsCK2YdKmewCDHk0pnOGQ4yNWtJOpH9Mo/h4Kn
\r
37 ALoCoQk4iUnnO6IZGRbxWqlIkfUeMOcJLLVKVm9ozjzJUFOSiuAdLEEdu39ExP84sw+HMJwKodm2
\r
38 X-Received: by 10.180.73.235 with SMTP id o11mr62664963wiv.51.1417418203148;
\r
39 Sun, 30 Nov 2014 23:16:43 -0800 (PST)
\r
40 Received: from disaster-area.hh.sledj.net
\r
41 ([2a01:348:1a2:1:ea39:35ff:fe2c:a227])
\r
42 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
\r
43 kn5sm26318178wjb.48.2014.11.30.23.16.42 for <multiple recipients>
\r
44 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
\r
45 Sun, 30 Nov 2014 23:16:42 -0800 (PST)
\r
46 Received: from localhost (30000@localhost [local]);
\r
47 by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id a675c95a;
\r
48 Mon, 1 Dec 2014 07:16:40 +0000 (UTC)
\r
49 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org,
\r
50 759646@bugs.debian.org
\r
51 Subject: Re: [Vagrant Cascadian] Bug#759646: notmuch-emacs: switching mode=
\r
52 to invalid value sends unencrypted mail
\r
53 In-Reply-To: <87388zdg0z.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
54 References: <87lhq7npcw.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <87k35q2zso.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
55 <54055C53.40604@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
56 <m238caa1rk.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
57 <cunzjbwi36y.fsf@gargravarr.hh.sledj.net>
\r
58 <87egsldds6.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
59 <cunegsjg9d8.fsf@gargravarr.hh.sledj.net>
\r
60 <87388zdg0z.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
61 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1
\r
62 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
63 From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
\r
64 Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 07:16:40 +0000
\r
65 Message-ID: <cun8uirg7qf.fsf@gargravarr.hh.sledj.net>
\r
67 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
68 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
69 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
71 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
72 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
73 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
74 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
75 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
76 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
77 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
78 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
79 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
80 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 07:16:57 -0000
\r
82 On Mon, Dec 01 2014, David Bremner wrote:
\r
83 > David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> writes:
\r
85 >>> I'm a little torn what to do here. On the one hand the upstream change
\r
86 >>> fixes the bug as reported. On the other hand, if something corrupts the
\r
87 >>> #secure tag (e.g., by deleting a letter), then the message is still sent
\r
90 >> I'm unclear on what you mean. Is it that "upgrade to 24.4" is not a good
\r
91 >> enough answer, because we are still leaving pre-24.4 people out in the
\r
94 > No, I mean the fix is rather narrow in that editing somewhere else on
\r
95 > the same line causes the same problem as before, even in 24.4
\r
97 Ah, okay. Well, off to emacs-devel with you, then :-D
\r