1 Return-Path: <me@pavpanchekha.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DC4431FBC
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 14 May 2012 23:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id 9PoCrXzaMTjX for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Mon, 14 May 2012 23:04:20 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail-gg0-f181.google.com (mail-gg0-f181.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.161.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D442431FAE
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 14 May 2012 23:04:20 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by ggnv5 with SMTP id v5so1815139ggn.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 14 May 2012 23:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
26 d=pavpanchekha.com; s=google;
\r
27 h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:from:date:message-id:subject:to
\r
28 :content-type; bh=Y6cKco1vwcBuh8bIohx1yDznVbtevTiu+x7rxGgYRiY=;
\r
29 b=qi97xKM6ACsxwxyAbNw3vwU07KVFd9cEWXrIrIKDrOg5z0dUq6QMSwTB+puo82MAFt
\r
30 DlZ8/T0vb4jJ1EBW61dDn87UnRYiZ3dbYRDcq+cIzXGGr1dO6Tfe4O/62C/mnAiG4HT5
\r
31 B7mXLHwJ/u8IH/cTQlf+QxgJuipKnTyk40ERU=
\r
32 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
33 d=google.com; s=20120113;
\r
34 h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:from:date:message-id:subject:to
\r
35 :content-type:x-gm-message-state;
\r
36 bh=Y6cKco1vwcBuh8bIohx1yDznVbtevTiu+x7rxGgYRiY=;
\r
37 b=pKBBOWEaEgBQwh+xlcpJr3vPsAxzvKAnQ+ENJkEY9iQWVA6d24YKc8XPRdajcv3B8f
\r
38 dY6Hyd35kvkkrN4URI9Kxq3FcYDdby/0++FrmLk2S0y72SNxnmu4k2kejlkNwEYJj0PQ
\r
39 pEd7Z4fvqQDKf9PCQjulCAolgX/QC1MjXUGUceSZ+GJhqPZ5TMTu6SXSDqmgIGtfmRJD
\r
40 737UJcOgHylGbvvghpANTzpjD8Sj656bglx/bNxmbTR9+9QHiOv2PcNybqDjMGGS2bt0
\r
41 0U2HOC68lKKXKCv+wBtW7w58dTvSlyGPGEkJ/M0fT28iGn3HAVqSMNdvI+Vb41f2TTfo
\r
43 Received: by 10.50.47.230 with SMTP id g6mr6733074ign.74.1337061858760; Mon,
\r
44 14 May 2012 23:04:18 -0700 (PDT)
\r
46 Received: by 10.50.76.135 with HTTP; Mon, 14 May 2012 23:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
\r
47 X-Originating-IP: [18.248.3.226]
\r
48 From: Pavel Panchekha <me@pavpanchekha.com>
\r
49 Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 02:03:58 -0400
\r
51 <CAE4=OQ80RLush229xi9uUu4VjG2tBrCmGcG7sGeVZbje7-ZBjw@mail.gmail.com>
\r
52 Subject: Mark feature in notmuch.el
\r
53 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
54 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340a372257d704c00cf942
\r
56 ALoCoQkCwKEMO5zAIZvH+yIYAMXQJaVZOs1ppB/Nr2CwCU2PsJBD9KEaP880RqGTYMPZt3Jz8rwx
\r
57 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 15 May 2012 02:07:50 -0700
\r
58 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
59 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
61 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
62 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
63 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
65 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
66 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
67 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
68 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
69 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
70 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 06:04:21 -0000
\r
72 --14dae9340a372257d704c00cf942
\r
73 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
\r
75 I was wondering if there were any plans to add a "mark" feature. By
\r
76 hitting some keybinding, one could mark some set of mails and then apply
\r
77 operations to them as a batch. This would be often useful for me for, for
\r
78 example, tagging all mails matching a search except some. If there were a
\r
79 way to mark ranges, this would also make the syntax of date searches less
\r
84 --14dae9340a372257d704c00cf942
\r
85 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
\r
86 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
88 <div>I was wondering if there were any plans to add a "mark" feat=
\r
89 ure. =C2=A0By hitting some keybinding, one could mark some set of mails and=
\r
90 then apply operations to them as a batch. =C2=A0This would be often useful=
\r
91 for me for, for example, tagging all mails matching a search except some. =
\r
92 =C2=A0If there were a way to mark ranges, this would also make the syntax o=
\r
93 f date searches less painful.</div>
\r
95 <br clear=3D"all">- Pavel Panchekha<br><br>
\r
97 --14dae9340a372257d704c00cf942--
\r