1 Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52050431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:01:44 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id sN9c-YUwuHY0 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:01:40 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])
\r
18 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E79CE431FAE
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:01:39 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034082078.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net
\r
23 ([156.34.82.78] helo=zancas.localnet)
\r
24 by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa
\r
25 (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72)
\r
26 (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
\r
27 id 1TnsUE-0002Yq-QC; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:01:38 -0400
\r
28 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80)
\r
29 (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
\r
30 id 1TnsU9-0008OW-7j; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:01:33 -0400
\r
31 From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
\r
32 To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
33 Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: show: make id links respect window
\r
34 In-Reply-To: <87mwx2jsu0.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
35 References: <1355958602-16752-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
36 <87bodjfnt0.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87mwx2jsu0.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
37 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+213~g4af1ac6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1
\r
38 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
39 Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:01:33 -0400
\r
40 Message-ID: <87bodgrh6a.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
42 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
44 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
45 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
47 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
48 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
49 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
50 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
51 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
52 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
53 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
54 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
55 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
56 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:01:44 -0000
\r
58 Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> writes:
\r
60 >> I can imagine that people would want/like the "open in other window"
\r
61 >> effect of the current code, even if the reason is a bug.
\r
63 > That's definitely possible. I generally expect a mouse click to select
\r
64 > the window I click and this feels counter intuitive. I think that some
\r
65 > people might like an option "open this link in a new window" but I would
\r
66 > guess that would like that whether they clicked or pressed RET on the
\r
69 I don't care much either way myself, but before we change notmuch-show
\r
70 behaviour (effectively) to accomodate notmuch-pick, I'd like a bit more
\r
71 feedback from other people.
\r