1 Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB41431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:08:49 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id KSmFpvP6SCAO for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:08:49 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC25431FB5
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:08:49 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from [192.168.23.207] (dsl254-070-154.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net
\r
22 by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 960BDF973
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:08:46 -0500 (EST)
\r
24 Message-ID: <4D6C00C7.9000705@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
25 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:08:39 -0500
\r
26 From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
27 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
\r
28 rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101213 Icedove/3.1.7
\r
30 To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
31 Subject: Re: [Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support
\r
32 References: <4CF15D67.1070904@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
33 <87aak08fu8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
34 <87fwsf9mip.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
35 <87tygl29vu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
36 <87oc5yi9us.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
37 <87d3mdvjwz.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>
\r
38 <87k4gk70ng.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
39 <87sjv8i7v6.fsf@irigaray.ross.mayfirst.org>
\r
40 <87sjv86mp9.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
41 <4D6BF0AA.3070706@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
42 <874o7o6ih5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
43 In-Reply-To: <874o7o6ih5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
44 X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
\r
45 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
\r
46 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
\r
47 boundary="------------enig4C161DD2745A51DCB955C40A"
\r
48 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
49 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
51 Reply-To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
52 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
53 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
54 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
55 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
56 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
57 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
58 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
59 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
60 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
61 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:08:49 -0000
\r
63 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
\r
64 --------------enig4C161DD2745A51DCB955C40A
\r
65 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
\r
66 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
68 On 02/28/2011 02:56 PM, Jameson Rollins wrote:
\r
69 > On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:59:54 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorse=
\r
71 >> But: what does the "signed" tag mean? i wouldn't want to necessarily
\r
72 >> conflate these four ideas:
\r
74 > These are good points, Daniel. However, I had actually just been
\r
75 > thinking of something much simpler, along the lines of just tagging
\r
76 > "signed" any message with a "multipart/signed" part, and "encrypted" an=
\r
78 > message with a "multipart/encrypted" part.
\r
80 this is a fair answer to my questions, not an evasion -- you're
\r
81 selecting level 0 in both tracks, which is not a bad thing (it's
\r
82 certainly simpler to get right!)
\r
84 The outstanding question in my mind is whether those tags could be
\r
85 mistaken by a na=C3=AFve user for meaning one of the other concepts. Is
\r
86 there a way to name the tags to minimize that kind of confusion?
\r
91 --------------enig4C161DD2745A51DCB955C40A
\r
92 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
\r
93 Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
\r
94 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
\r
96 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
97 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
\r
98 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
\r
100 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJNbADIXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
\r
101 ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwRUU1QkU5NzkyODJEODBCOUY3NTQwRjFD
\r
102 Q0QyRUQ5NEQyMTczOUU5AAoJEMzS7ZTSFznpo3kQAJ06AD+syC4vJoc0CSXSkf13
\r
103 RiZ5pAFPHEyV4kRYuPlx30ZdGw9X1/DRaih2dvIj88PM2DoMV3N9TiKjaQOytTxL
\r
104 vsDDQNUp/9YvnAMgoMF6ddQPsfvwBEaYW256iTDSctQ3rtzX5MWmfrGhln5IOYqF
\r
105 CAxazaBPkyDgeyj46cRNLp7Z603Z1jzQ8ZVnGNnmjSuyeV0/BCx44cPrcWcnn4Pe
\r
106 OqEa1byFHbOAvZgdV4qN7dGGWFXshtyRnG9JPASObUyILatv3wESqxZPB2aXIF1h
\r
107 RLEsP/5soILZoNz/QerR55WriNPPZT4aBQyw20mJNm2corzX0b0t5b91gg6mxtrf
\r
108 xP3rocdXdZnbJ7hiX1ZnkG23VJLpSthZulFln6A9mZsnacRyT5rcVJCpqxZdKLxD
\r
109 cSf8Eqw4LoyVCRNBS7b8Uwj02XgQ6YpKCOQWrEcYuDDqoRBN5cb4SOKsQQmUKZ2h
\r
110 7V1UvOA+DB5L5rriwgWPGhhq+kUkwN0SGa6eVbhQ4OY5eqenjHoCAz9Ad4QOnXkF
\r
111 8XmBp69kuqvLK7dh5XWHY/RA5C9d2jYxn5wEHHj4tqKj/qCBeiYM5q//L2TW5EYk
\r
112 Pn0H2VGognOgY4wttjrNrV7LHiRouExCYJT11LqTq/FBPtOfE9fO6RfFSBQ3qfkN
\r
113 wM/3brd7I9Nv7eUOVsXS
\r
115 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
117 --------------enig4C161DD2745A51DCB955C40A--
\r