Re: database error
[notmuch-archives.git] / e9 / d7896a9c2272712c8ddbbeb9f6b4221799d89e
1 Return-Path: <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F77D431FD0\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:51:35 -0800 (PST)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -0.09\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
13         RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
16         with ESMTP id 0ZztL5KXR1M6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
17         Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:51:35 -0800 (PST)\r
18 Received: from homiemail-a23.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbef.dreamhost.com\r
19         [208.97.132.145])\r
20         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB02E431FB5\r
21         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:51:34 -0800 (PST)\r
22 Received: from homiemail-a23.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
23         by homiemail-a23.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8D04B006D;\r
24         Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:51:33 -0800 (PST)\r
25 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:cc:subject\r
26         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:\r
27         content-type; q=dns; s=sspaeth.de; b=D536UMQojiicyrwTybxs2xNSPI4\r
28         0P0ogTtou7q+CrH6pAILrzKeKiiOGlLZnNEp2UfsivJoIsUhZX7RFqmDEmD/oG3L\r
29         UnlF9g99IdwyYWTBUjR4UlSOJIyQldqo9y78Q5IykkAbJu7pZw2uhSGTfJUa5LDa\r
30         o47haHbOUzyqVps0=\r
31 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:cc\r
32         :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:\r
33         content-type; s=sspaeth.de; bh=bkD+Hm+HQIpDoTevLBT0H+W/fO0=; b=f\r
34         PfULKEWdmtQDTchsio1pZq5Ss1kNBCmyyc8KUzepCl90DgWEehpkKNUqQJWLXTjz\r
35         duT8EpDn3yxNJve1qxNB4pR2bPM+8x8zKtxIwF+JO2IPGYr7tTjpn7gBMKA5FCCB\r
36         MyBkwo6gfhA6P+ZoifloMUugH3gjaHpyIQSxNoGMb4=\r
37 Received: from spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (mtec-hg-docking-1-dhcp-186.ethz.ch\r
38         [129.132.133.186]) (Authenticated sender: fax@sspaeth.de)\r
39         by homiemail-a23.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7780A4B0060; \r
40         Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:51:31 -0800 (PST)\r
41 Received: by spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation);\r
42         Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:51:29 +0100\r
43 From: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>\r
44 To: Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu>, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>\r
45 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] new: Do not defer maildir flag synchronization during\r
46         the first run\r
47 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin8DdhHU7JRnobxZQGWadD0VH2_HKLx4tPWq4YG@mail.gmail.com>\r
48 References: <AANLkTin8DdhHU7JRnobxZQGWadD0VH2_HKLx4tPWq4YG@mail.gmail.com>\r
49 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-37-g3863e88 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1\r
50         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
51 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:51:29 +0100\r
52 Message-ID: <87zkql76ni.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
53 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
54 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
55         micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
56 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
57 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
58 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
59 Precedence: list\r
60 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
61         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
62 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
63         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
64 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
65 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
66 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
67 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
68         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
69 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:51:35 -0000\r
70 \r
71 --=-=-=\r
72 \r
73 On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:08:38 -0500, Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu> wrote:\r
74 \r
75 > I added a "notmuch_database_remove_message_get" to the public API that's\r
76 > just like "notmuch_database_remove_message" except that it also returns a\r
77 > notmuch_message_t if other instances of the message still exist.  It feels\r
78 > clunky to have two almost identical variants of this function.  Is this the\r
79 > preferred way to change the public API?  Or should I just add the argument\r
80 > to the existing function and fix the other three calls to it?\r
81 \r
82 Just adding an argument to the public API without library version bump would\r
83 break my python bindings. So if we modify the public API, I would prefer\r
84 if we rename the function and remove the old one completely. That I\r
85 could detect at least.\r
86 \r
87 Sebastian\r
88 \r
89 --=-=-=\r
90 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
91 \r
92 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
93 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
94 \r
95 iEYEARECAAYFAk1Cg5EACgkQVYX1jMgnoGLU1QCeK9NO2LKxXgpGewkBIf5FRrYb\r
96 qWcAnAq3NAbMjONycWu1iz7l4PdfPeRJ\r
97 =//gL\r
98 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
99 --=-=-=--\r