1 Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D434413FE8
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 08:11:14 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id 6u7Od2aFOTxc for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sun, 8 Jan 2012 08:11:14 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com
\r
18 [74.125.83.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client
\r
19 certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
\r
20 B5DA2413FEC for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 08:11:13 -0800
\r
22 Received: by eekd41 with SMTP id d41so2373928eek.26
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:11:12 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 Received: by 10.213.28.193 with SMTP id n1mr976763ebc.43.1326039072213;
\r
25 Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:11:12 -0800 (PST)
\r
26 Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw4-fe5cdc00-23.dhcp.inet.fi.
\r
27 [80.220.92.23]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
\r
28 y12sm277472800eeb.11.2012.01.08.08.11.09
\r
29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:11:10 -0800 (PST)
\r
30 From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
\r
31 To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org,
\r
33 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Add the option "--reply-to" to notmuch reply.
\r
34 In-Reply-To: <87y5tiqljv.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
35 References: <8739btdkir.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
36 <1325856857-15969-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
37 <871urafjiy.fsf@nikula.org> <87y5tiqljv.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
38 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+182~g93862a2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
40 Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 18:11:08 +0200
\r
41 Message-ID: <871urarx7n.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
44 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
45 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
47 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
48 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
49 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
50 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
51 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
52 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
53 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
54 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
55 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
56 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:11:14 -0000
\r
58 On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:08:20 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
59 > I think replying to an email which we sent and which does not have any
\r
60 > other person on the to: line is sufficiently rare that it doesn't really
\r
61 > matter what we do in this case.
\r
63 I ended up fixing all of this properly. I'm hoping to send the patches
\r
64 later today so you can have a look - the code will do a better job of
\r
65 explaining itself than I'd do now. :)
\r