1 Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3787D431FAE
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 08:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
\r
13 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id bvs-K7M4vFgs for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Mon, 7 May 2012 08:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])
\r
19 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A66F431FBC
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 08:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])
\r
24 by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
\r
25 (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)
\r
26 id 1SRQ8o-0005L5-UQ; Mon, 07 May 2012 16:46:27 +0100
\r
27 Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223]
\r
29 by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)
\r
30 (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)
\r
31 id 1SRQ8o-0005Mw-Mo; Mon, 07 May 2012 16:46:26 +0100
\r
32 From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
33 To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
\r
34 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
35 Subject: Re: [Patch v2] emacs: add pipe attachment command
\r
36 In-Reply-To: <87zk9kc8yj.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
37 References: <1336374129-10225-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
38 <1336376008-13014-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
39 <87zk9kc8yj.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
40 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+128~g0f26d91 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
41 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
42 Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 16:46:43 +0100
\r
43 Message-ID: <87y5p4xacc.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
45 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
46 X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223
\r
47 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :)
\r
48 X-QM-Body-MD5: 424f40f19dbdd2bccc1ab9ffbcc862f0 (of first 20000 bytes)
\r
49 X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8
\r
50 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -
\r
51 X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to
\r
53 spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.
\r
54 This message scored -1.8 points.
\r
55 Summary of the scoring:
\r
56 * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
\r
58 * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]
\r
59 * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
\r
60 provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)
\r
61 * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
\r
63 * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
\r
64 X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean
\r
65 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
66 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
68 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
69 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
70 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
71 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
72 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
73 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
74 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
75 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
76 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
77 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 15:46:33 -0000
\r
80 On Mon, 07 May 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
\r
81 > On Mon, May 07 2012, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
82 >> Here is a rebased to current master version of the previous patch: no
\r
85 > Actually, what I sent was a rebase.
\r
87 Sorry somehow I missed that you had actually sent the rebase too: and
\r
88 then I messed up my rebase. How embarrassing!
\r
90 Anyway many thanks for the correct rebase, and for spotting my stupid error.
\r