1 Return-Path: <pieter@praet.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4322E431FAE
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:36:39 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id JF3AeYvb-sc5 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:36:38 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com
\r
18 [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F403431FAF
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:36:38 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: by wibhi8 with SMTP id hi8so4341414wib.26
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:36:37 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of pieter@praet.org designates
\r
25 10.180.99.7 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.99.7;
\r
26 Authentication-Results: mr.google.com;
\r
27 spf=pass (google.com: domain of pieter@praet.org
\r
28 designates 10.180.99.7 as permitted sender)
\r
29 smtp.mail=pieter@praet.org
\r
30 Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.99.7])
\r
31 by 10.180.99.7 with SMTP id em7mr42090910wib.7.1330457797242 (num_hops
\r
32 = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:36:37 -0800 (PST)
\r
33 Received: by 10.180.99.7 with SMTP id em7mr33397748wib.7.1330457797126;
\r
34 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:36:37 -0800 (PST)
\r
35 Received: from localhost ([109.131.112.224])
\r
36 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gm1sm25107153wib.7.2012.02.28.11.36.35
\r
37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
38 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:36:36 -0800 (PST)
\r
39 From: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>
\r
40 To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,
\r
41 Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
42 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] emacs: more flexible and consistent tagging
\r
44 In-Reply-To: <m2wr781gaa.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
45 References: <1327725684-5887-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
46 <1328426033-21480-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
47 <87wr7xqpuf.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca> <878vjtqhcg.fsf@praet.org>
\r
48 <87haye6g1c.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
49 <m2wr781gaa.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
50 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+210~g6afc43e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
51 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
\r
52 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:34:13 +0100
\r
53 Message-ID: <87k436ycp6.fsf@praet.org>
\r
55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
57 ALoCoQmlspjopMmv0U3umoRSO+buOfqaUiNxr5eAaBolL50ANnJDrdqE5x4AKqJOdO+abRvov6e6
\r
58 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
59 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
61 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
62 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
63 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
65 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
66 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
67 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
68 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
69 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
70 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:36:39 -0000
\r
72 On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:50:53 +0200, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote:
\r
73 > On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:20:31 -0400, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
\r
74 > > On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:
\r
75 > > > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
\r
76 > > > > On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
78 > > > How about if '*' applies to all messages (as it currently does),
\r
79 > > > but 'C-u *' only to open messages? That would make more sense IMHO.
\r
81 > > > But, conforming to your original request, I've implemented the inverse.
\r
84 > > Thanks for implementing that. I could live with either way. Do other
\r
85 > > people have opinions on this? My reasoning is if you descend into a
\r
86 > > thread from some search page, it seems likely that you want to operate
\r
87 > > on the messages matching the search.
\r
89 > I've pretty soon lost the original open/close status as I often navigate
\r
90 > through messages by opening/closing messages, so for me not operating
\r
91 > on all messages in thread is magic behaviour. In case I'd use C-u *
\r
92 > I first have to check through the full thread what are the actual
\r
93 > messages currently open (lots of screen scrolling :( )
\r
96 I share your sentiment. Also, the function is called `notmuch-show-tag-all',
\r
97 so having it operate only on open messages would be counterintuitive IMO.
\r
99 In other words, I think of the prefix arg as being a modifier for the
\r
102 But either way, it's fairly trivial to invert its behavior [1].
\r
104 > So, I prefer '*' operating on all messages in a thread and C-u '*'
\r
105 > for all open messages in a thread.
\r
118 [1] id:"87sjhz22vw.fsf@praet.org"
\r
projects / notmuch-archives.git / blob