1 Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D72A431FBD
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 11:38:02 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id EpNPPKrIhPLg for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sat, 8 Feb 2014 11:37:55 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960F6431FBC
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 11:37:55 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1])
\r
21 by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DF5100033;
\r
22 Sat, 8 Feb 2014 21:37:43 +0200 (EET)
\r
23 From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
24 To: "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>
\r
25 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] nmbug-status: Python-3-compabitility and general
\r
27 In-Reply-To: <20140208190923.GE14197@odin.tremily.us>
\r
28 References: <m2a9e6zppp.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
29 <20140204191453.GV14197@odin.tremily.us>
\r
30 <m2fvnywsly.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
31 <m2fvnxvc2q.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
32 <20140205152738.GJ14197@odin.tremily.us>
\r
33 <m28utp6ugv.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
34 <20140206181400.GP14197@odin.tremily.us>
\r
35 <87ob2hogkr.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
36 <20140208171617.GD14197@odin.tremily.us>
\r
37 <m2eh3dsbje.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
38 <20140208190923.GE14197@odin.tremily.us>
\r
39 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+69~g761b031 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
40 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
\r
41 X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL
\r
42 $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F
\r
43 !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z
\r
44 Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 21:37:43 +0200
\r
45 Message-ID: <m27g95s8e0.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
47 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
\r
48 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
49 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
50 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
51 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
53 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
54 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
55 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
56 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
57 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
58 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
59 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
60 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
61 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
62 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 19:38:02 -0000
\r
64 On Sat, Feb 08 2014, "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> wrote:
\r
66 > On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 08:29:41PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
\r
67 >> On Sat, Feb 08 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:
\r
68 >> > On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 09:54:28AM -0400, David Bremner wrote:
\r
70 >> >> yeah, the colour scheme is not my favourite. For the sake of being
\r
71 >> >> semi-constructive, I attach an alternative suggestion #ffd96e and
\r
76 >> I'm fine with that too.
\r
78 > Updated in my example and nmbug-status-python3 branch.
\r
80 >> >> More importantly some of the threads are run together: e.g.=20
\r
82 >> >> id:"4eddf2b1.4288980a.0b74.5557@mx.google.com" and
\r
83 >> >> id:"E1RYMYd-0003wu-Ea@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de"
\r
85 >> > Both of those messages are part of the same thread
\r
86 >> > (thread:000000000000eaab on my box, but I doubt thread IDs are
\r
87 >> > portable), so I don't add a thread-separating space between them.
\r
88 >> > Would you like more message-separating space even between messages
\r
89 >> > in the same thread?
\r
93 >> I think the more space does not fix anything but it might help
\r
94 >> regognizing message boundaries a bit (and thus would be a nice
\r
97 > Added to my example and nmbug-status-python3 branch. I'm using CSS
\r
98 > for this new spacing, so non-CSS browsers (e.g. w3m) won't render the
\r
99 > inter-message spacing. I think the colored-link (second message row)
\r
100 > vs. default id (first message row) makes inter-message separation
\r
101 > clear enough in that case.
\r
103 The 2 0.5em:s adds up to 1em between messages and that IMHO makes the
\r
104 messages be too far apart from each other. I changed the padding-top
\r
105 and padding-bottom values to 0.25em which IMHO is better...
\r