1 Return-Path: <servilio@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE1C40D142
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
\r
13 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001]
\r
15 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
16 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
17 with ESMTP id to0j7AY4s0ex for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
18 Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
\r
19 Received: from mail-iw0-f181.google.com (mail-iw0-f181.google.com
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E1F40D141
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so1941878iwn.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
26 h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
\r
27 :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
\r
28 :content-transfer-encoding;
\r
29 bh=XUWj4cChi5iQ5qjH2j2pSJTf/UIhlNvI0yOv0t6kpdE=;
\r
30 b=ZbUZMRpaZqhln7ixUbdPPgqriJWrqOiZgIUvbbSZ8mlyVxpvrJT9GzO0vZ22+QbCXp
\r
31 cLyNdZsE1vzredc5r6KOyq7wUjQL+5dbYwams6XEUwPiORODQXH7aRAzEi41CnpU6Min
\r
32 t+q22li4an/+NSWl8msuQiagkpVjf4iD/K+wc=
\r
33 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
34 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
\r
35 :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
\r
36 b=C+vcEe6pG5Ar5/DDOvqjqXia9kysYtfmMR7uoJKbfCRCVcXqJMZ3+xIN61MB1pmrzi
\r
37 y/VRTksZo/mYJbJh5pRRO7sLf514WgE5WoFGszn+m1JN5Z3DZ159Oh//TPM1QYoxzqej
\r
38 +wpP+zLhprtOqgQTjy+dn6k7HabRjh+UfbKRc=
\r
40 Received: by 10.42.193.17 with SMTP id ds17mr1885122icb.276.1286824307326;
\r
41 Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
\r
42 Received: by 10.42.165.10 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
\r
43 In-Reply-To: <87pqvgr1u5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
44 References: <AANLkTimes1ndLhOxJupDh72h1MRR0q28wu7mjAeCOzVu@mail.gmail.com>
\r
45 <87pqvgr1u5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
46 Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:11:47 -0400
\r
47 Message-ID: <AANLkTinMp2tJSu3xtrFN+kbntDJxc==S1BCMK3pc+cBk@mail.gmail.com>
\r
48 Subject: Re: notmuch-next branch
\r
49 From: Servilio Afre Puentes <servilio@gmail.com>
\r
50 To: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
\r
52 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
53 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
54 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
55 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
57 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
58 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
59 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
60 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
61 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
62 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
63 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
64 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
65 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
66 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:11:59 -0000
\r
68 On 11 October 2010 15:01, Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrot=
\r
70 > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gm=
\r
72 >> I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So
\r
73 >> I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or
\r
74 >> gitorious (please vote).
\r
76 >> More than one person should have write access to this repo, but some
\r
77 >> guidelines should be in place. I propose that patches should be
\r
78 >> signed-off-by at least another person in the mailing list before
\r
79 >> pushing. It would be nice if this is how the mainline branch works,
\r
80 >> but we don't need to wait for that to happen. We need to vote on who
\r
81 >> are the people to have write access.
\r
83 > I think this generally sounds like a fine idea, but I don't see why we
\r
84 > need a single central repo that multiple people need access to. =A0The
\r
85 > whole point of git is to allow for distributed development without need
\r
86 > for a central repo.
\r
88 > In this case, folks can just merge the patches they're interested in
\r
89 > into a "next" branch in their own personal repos, publish them where
\r
90 > ever they want, and then every body can just keep their "next" branches
\r
91 > synced with each other. =A0As consensus is reached, the next release will
\r
94 +1 and maintaining a list of these repos in the wiki ;)
\r