1 Return-Path: <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DA240DBD2
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 07:57:53 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=unavailable
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id EDrde+fVQX3w for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Thu, 11 Nov 2010 07:57:40 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451DD40DBFB
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 07:57:40 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.4])
\r
21 by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F7B19F334C;
\r
22 Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:57:39 +0100 (CET)
\r
23 X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS
\r
24 Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1])
\r
25 by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.4]) (amavisd-new,
\r
27 with ESMTP id g+qALDpSh9zb; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:57:38 +0100 (CET)
\r
28 Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34])
\r
29 by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BD319F3340;
\r
30 Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:57:38 +0100 (CET)
\r
31 Received: from steelpick.2x.cz (note-sojka.felk.cvut.cz [147.32.86.30])
\r
32 (Authenticated sender: sojkam1)
\r
33 by imap.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14CD1FA004;
\r
34 Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:57:38 +0100 (CET)
\r
35 Received: from wsh by steelpick.2x.cz with local (Exim 4.72)
\r
36 (envelope-from <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>)
\r
37 id 1PGZWr-0001Cw-SE; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:57:37 +0100
\r
38 From: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
39 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
40 Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: Better handling of stdout and stderr
\r
41 In-Reply-To: <8739r8bt9u.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
42 References: <1289346035-24904-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
43 <87k4kkq3r2.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
44 <8739r8bt9u.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
45 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.4-30-ga01dbf0 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
\r
46 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
47 Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:57:37 +0100
\r
48 Message-ID: <87sjz7hmz2.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
\r
50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
51 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
52 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
54 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
55 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
56 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
57 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
58 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
59 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
61 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
62 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
63 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:57:53 -0000
\r
65 On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
\r
66 > On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:15:45 -0800, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
\r
67 > > Meanwhile, I've just now pushed out my little test-lib.sh change, so you
\r
68 > > can update the patch for that as well.
\r
70 > Oh, and one other thing I forgot to mention about the patch. It
\r
71 > currently talks about things along the lines of "git-style tests" and
\r
72 > "cworth-style tests".
\r
74 > You and I might understand perfectly well what that means now, but we
\r
75 > need the test suite to be independently comprehensible. (I'd like to be
\r
76 > able to understand it myself when I look at it again in the future,
\r
77 > having forgotten the current history.)
\r
79 > So if you could describe these instead as something like "tests using
\r
80 > test_expect_success" vs. "tests using
\r
81 > test_begin_subtest/test_expect_equal" or something like that, that would
\r
84 I'll look at this tomorrow.
\r