1 Return-Path: <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932C9431FBF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 8 May 2014 15:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id xkayktZLVnGR for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Thu, 8 May 2014 15:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail-ee0-f48.google.com (mail-ee0-f48.google.com
\r
19 [74.125.83.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client
\r
20 certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
\r
21 E1C7A431FAE for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 8 May 2014 15:45:31 -0700
\r
23 Received: by mail-ee0-f48.google.com with SMTP id e49so2117435eek.7
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 08 May 2014 15:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
\r
27 :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition
\r
28 :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent;
\r
29 bh=biXv/YSaJ8V7QGwigqWzTQEbCc4DScqWJ88IbWGAjwg=;
\r
30 b=N5eh1wwSWcjgTw+PlM8Q0WyvyEY8T8COZEoQ7dsVMp9Q5IQAYwEYZfXVPMpVGNKIx7
\r
31 E3DIz9IpZj+cTBP49MdXRClJTB5SFRv730cUkAsFv+i2vuVIdEO2Tj3azWWiLKin6DsI
\r
32 iCr8aEBtref0KjUKtQHuLpd6DwhRsiiEVoSyvzZrs3Klpnltyi6rsEcVQkg+wums8n5E
\r
33 l3CYFivY+vrPwLCGs7qGT5RXvx0B9KpgxFTVAmJpCsYyM/rwY9iV7AZ0DoCj4hlKHuCf
\r
34 mAMSxXSnGGJKfkYlqkKA1+YNaKqsigJSINzMu/m7Nv6SsMHMs32fKFV182pzuanIw6iR
\r
36 X-Received: by 10.14.108.198 with SMTP id q46mr8563541eeg.31.1399589130644;
\r
37 Thu, 08 May 2014 15:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
\r
38 Received: from chitra.no-ip.org (sd44012d5.adsl.online.nl. [212.64.18.213])
\r
39 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u46sm7178929eel.1.2014.05.08.15.45.29
\r
40 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
41 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
\r
42 Thu, 08 May 2014 15:45:29 -0700 (PDT)
\r
43 Sender: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>
\r
44 Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 00:45:27 +0200
\r
45 From: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
\r
46 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
47 Subject: Re: Submodules for language bindings (was: Github?)
\r
48 Message-ID: <20140508224527.GC2374@chitra.no-ip.org>
\r
49 Mail-Followup-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
51 <CA+kKtKAw=nEn2dfcvF6++gD5ng+S3T8SLAdVL=Hs=EsvwUg6aw@mail.gmail.com>
\r
52 <87iopgkaiz.fsf@nikula.org> <E1WiJsj-0004mz-VK@teckel.deptj.eu>
\r
53 <20140508101325.GC23124@vilya.m0g.net>
\r
54 <CA+kKtKA8Q5z6Pys9RAumLTiJvmGwWYKGXDkKr9Mh_6ecV-7sdA@mail.gmail.com>
\r
55 <CA+kKtKCP8Oo2sHz5Cd0+=BmS9UK=b2h9GrGopUFwWZ=GJUXqyA@mail.gmail.com>
\r
56 <20140508203019.GA2374@chitra.no-ip.org>
\r
57 <20140508212100.GD23124@vilya.m0g.net>
\r
58 <20140508220046.GB2374@chitra.no-ip.org>
\r
59 <20140508222931.GU28634@odin.tremily.us>
\r
61 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
\r
62 Content-Disposition: inline
\r
63 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
\r
64 In-Reply-To: <20140508222931.GU28634@odin.tremily.us>
\r
65 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1 (2013-10-16)
\r
66 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
67 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
69 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
70 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
71 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
72 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
73 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
74 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
75 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
76 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
77 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
78 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 22:45:37 -0000
\r
80 On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:29:31PM -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
\r
81 > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:00:46AM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
\r
82 > > One of my TODOs is to also package the ruby bindings, and
\r
83 > > notmuch-vim. The only thing preventing me now is my unfamiliarty
\r
84 > > with ruby, and Fedora packaging guidelines for ruby-gems.
\r
86 > I think this is one argument argument in favor of submodules, because
\r
87 > they make it easy to treat the bindings as separate packages. Once
\r
88 > you have separate packages, it's easy to delegate packaging (e.g. “I
\r
89 > don't use the Ruby bindings, so I'm not going to maintain the
\r
90 > Ruby-binding package. I'll leave that to Alice, who likes Ruby, but
\r
91 > is less familiar with $distro's Python packaging”).
\r
93 Well as far as my understanding of rpm goes, sub-packages are prefered
\r
94 here rather than independent packages. I believe the reason is again
\r
95 easier dependency tracking[1]; all sub-packages share the same source
\r
96 rpm, so no explicit `Requires' in the spec file.
\r
102 [1] yum and it's ilk don't do that by magic, the packager needs to add
\r
103 instructions in the spec file for that to work correctly. With
\r
104 sub-packages, this becomes redundant.
\r
109 Open source is the future. It sets us free.
\r