Re: [PATCH] emacs: wash: make word-wrap bound message width
[notmuch-archives.git] / df / ef01310f8603fb25c20af3f82ae149b682e260
1 Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA120431FAF\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:12 -0800 (PST)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -0.699\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
15         with ESMTP id BL+--t8SEjLT for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
16         Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:12 -0800 (PST)\r
17 Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com\r
18         [209.85.214.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
19         (No client certificate requested)\r
20         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F2AC431FAE\r
21         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:12 -0800 (PST)\r
22 Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id oi10so1307158obb.26\r
23         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:10 -0800 (PST)\r
24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
25         d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
26         h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to\r
27         :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;\r
28         bh=/2/FnH4eE+71wfLTbIyFh4EFDbTzAm7EpB20GDoUde8=;\r
29         b=XTS1HuMhDJ7zd6hNCLzRf/udmwy6DZE0mqxLOlu+Ar+mZqEU4OmD1esWhc2Q1mSo12\r
30         Ifhf1NDwH2hvuR9SsrruChaBKIDyxIJv88jODPq9oYP00JJ1lxy3FvmEy357h3xaOZcn\r
31         skJZ/FOB0UJ3bgPlp2y09DcHo4R6Ktd8qhOff0fXQx/QXkhhqHHIffZf8jTIuSgajFNT\r
32         T6+1uo70jLF5t/pGKkUJ1F5SS71zbz91S4FPR2Pf8QAQ7jxJE4x37tJRbcRbtbyskwx1\r
33         jC8y2sUbkHVJQUeVMdEcxL7E/IpHsOc8oxEayhiqqDVb4/DP6ha4/Qfsh41T8toxncBN\r
34         Xujw==\r
35 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
36 Received: by 10.182.95.133 with SMTP id dk5mr2852403obb.14.1354102150634; Wed,\r
37         28 Nov 2012 03:29:10 -0800 (PST)\r
38 Received: by 10.76.69.138 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:10 -0800 (PST)\r
39 Received: by 10.76.69.138 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:10 -0800 (PST)\r
40 In-Reply-To:\r
41  <CAMP44s26iY8eKDLCeLe-jO9Y+AY-+NnS+UZeUMQnLxNniL9xqg@mail.gmail.com>\r
42 References: <k8vn08$62g$2@ger.gmane.org> <87zk24ctko.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>\r
43         <50B3871B.2050509@gmail.com> <87r4ngcl00.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>\r
44         <50B48627.9040409@gmail.com> <xa1tfw3vugkf.fsf@mina86.com>\r
45         <CAGhLh6Fhxq=bFHVPfVaMg0dXLgF3VEr-nBh62CbBAW7arwsM9Q@mail.gmail.com>\r
46         <xa1t8v9mvogd.fsf@mina86.com>\r
47         <CAGhLh6HKLwFbyfp8AfYLJuhhCxQUCpZ4F8nfJ6q1WmBZVOZSuQ@mail.gmail.com>\r
48         <xa1t38zuvmqb.fsf@mina86.com> <50B5BDFF.1080802@gmail.com>\r
49         <CAMP44s26iY8eKDLCeLe-jO9Y+AY-+NnS+UZeUMQnLxNniL9xqg@mail.gmail.com>\r
50 Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:29:10 +0200\r
51 Message-ID:\r
52  <CAB+hUn8XcHRVAhFLmqxUEDh7hvXX898Rm0-bjRXNkfce=ZHOZw@mail.gmail.com>\r
53 Subject: Re: gmail label support patch available for oflineimap\r
54 From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
55 To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
56 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93b62a2ad9c1f04cf8c7988\r
57 X-Gm-Message-State:\r
58  ALoCoQklvfDDxB+JlbXp72sjzVzQl6HP1Z2WjqpK6VK3qH8AMAaOHH8JRBRAz+CY8OgjSJhszYYW\r
59 Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>, Rainer@krugs.de\r
60 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
61 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
62 Precedence: list\r
63 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
64         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
65 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
66         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
67 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
68 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
69 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
70 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
71         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
72 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:29:12 -0000\r
73 \r
74 --14dae93b62a2ad9c1f04cf8c7988\r
75 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
76 \r
77 On Nov 28, 2012 12:10 PM, "Felipe Contreras" <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
78 wrote:\r
79 >\r
80 > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Rainer M Krug <r.m.krug@gmail.com> wrote:\r
81 >\r
82 > >> I just want to say that having notmuch communicate with Gmail is\r
83 terrible idea, since this\r
84 > >> would mean duplicating of jobs that offlineimap and notmuch do.\r
85 > >\r
86 > > My sentiments, notmuch is doing realy good what it is doing, and adding\r
87 gmail / other server\r
88 > > communication is not the best idea.\r
89 >\r
90 > And I disagree.\r
91 \r
92 Which part do you disagree with, before or after "and", or both? Care to\r
93 elaborate, in either case? Any concrete suggestions?\r
94 \r
95 BR,\r
96 Jani.\r
97 \r
98 --14dae93b62a2ad9c1f04cf8c7988\r
99 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8\r
100 \r
101 <p><br>\r
102 On Nov 28, 2012 12:10 PM, &quot;Felipe Contreras&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:felipe.contreras@gmail.com">felipe.contreras@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>\r
103 &gt;<br>\r
104 &gt; On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Rainer M Krug &lt;<a href="mailto:r.m.krug@gmail.com">r.m.krug@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>\r
105 &gt;<br>\r
106 &gt; &gt;&gt; I just want to say that having notmuch communicate with Gmail is terrible idea, since this<br>\r
107 &gt; &gt;&gt; would mean duplicating of jobs that offlineimap and notmuch do.<br>\r
108 &gt; &gt;<br>\r
109 &gt; &gt; My sentiments, notmuch is doing realy good what it is doing, and adding gmail / other server<br>\r
110 &gt; &gt; communication is not the best idea.<br>\r
111 &gt;<br>\r
112 &gt; And I disagree.</p>\r
113 <p>Which part do you disagree with, before or after &quot;and&quot;, or both? Care to elaborate, in either case? Any concrete suggestions?</p>\r
114 <p>BR,<br>\r
115 Jani.<br>\r
116 </p>\r
117 \r
118 --14dae93b62a2ad9c1f04cf8c7988--\r