1 Return-Path: <BATV+7d079ec6ed591f168fc6+2419+infradead.org+hohndel@bombadil.srs.infradead.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660A24196F2
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 07:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id IQYzLFlEt7aG for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Thu, 8 Apr 2010 07:55:41 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24134196F0
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 07:55:41 -0700 (PDT)
\r
20 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=localhost.localdomain)
\r
21 by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
\r
22 id 1Nzt8u-0004rY-Pd; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:55:40 +0000
\r
23 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 500)
\r
24 id 4F20CC00E4; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 07:55:40 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 From: Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org>
\r
26 To: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>, Carl Worth
\r
27 <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
28 Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)
\r
29 In-Reply-To: <87vdc2aw6i.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
30 References: <8739z6rjxf.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
31 <87vdc2aw6i.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
32 Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:55:40 -0700
\r
33 Message-ID: <m3vdc2gfir.fsf@x200.gr8dns.org>
\r
35 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
36 X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hohndel@infradead.org> by
\r
37 bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
\r
38 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
39 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
41 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
42 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
43 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
44 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
45 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
46 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
47 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
48 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
49 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
50 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:55:43 -0000
\r
52 On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:52:21 -0400, Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
\r
53 > > So keep the patches coming, and the pointers to patches that you want me
\r
56 > I would really like to see the patch in spaetz/issue15-handle-fcc-bcc
\r
57 > applied soon. This is the lingering issue of bcc'ing the primary email
\r
58 > address in notmuch replies, which I think really needs to be removed.
\r
62 The FCC solution is much more sane. Especially with the From address
\r
63 based path selection that I proposed (but haven't been able to implement
\r
64 for lack of Lisp skills)
\r
70 Intel Open Source Technology Center
\r