1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BA5431FCB
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id wAXCL8NBpWv4 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu
\r
19 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E235431FC9
\r
20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
\r
21 Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
22 by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1632A32810C;
\r
23 Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new
\r
25 Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-107-185-189-81.socal.res.rr.com
\r
26 [107.185.189.81]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)
\r
27 by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7155328184;
\r
28 Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
\r
29 Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
30 id 7FA8C60123; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:24:42 -0700 (PDT)
\r
31 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
32 To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>, David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
\r
33 Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: sign/encrypt replies to signed/encrypted messages
\r
35 <CAB+hUn9YeDY0u4+1=ru6VZVBJar4YfAK=nhORLhOO0EmyO2K_g@mail.gmail.com>
\r
36 References: <87a9f1c8aq.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
37 <1396689486-19232-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org>
\r
38 <8738hf25pa.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
39 <CAB+hUn9YeDY0u4+1=ru6VZVBJar4YfAK=nhORLhOO0EmyO2K_g@mail.gmail.com>
\r
40 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+197~g37a1196 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
41 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
42 Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:24:40 -0700
\r
43 Message-ID: <87lhv7sr9z.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
45 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
46 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
47 Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
48 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
49 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
51 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
52 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
53 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
54 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
55 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
56 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
57 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
58 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
59 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
60 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 18:24:57 -0000
\r
63 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
65 On Mon, Apr 14 2014, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
\r
66 > On Apr 14, 2014 10:17 AM, "David Bremner" <david@tethera.net> wrote:
\r
68 >> Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> writes:
\r
69 >> > +(defun notmuch-mua-reply-crypto (parts)
\r
70 >> > + (loop for part in parts
\r
71 >> > + if (notmuch-match-content-type (plist-get part :content-type)
\r
72 > "multipart/signed")
\r
73 >> > + do (mml-secure-message-sign)
\r
75 >> How do people feel about disabling/removing the previous two lines?
\r
78 > I'd be fine with that (see the commit message).
\r
80 I'd be fine with that as well. I auto-sign all outgoing mail regardless
\r
81 of the signature status of what I'm replying to, so that's fine.
\r
82 Auto-encrypting replies to encrypted mail is actually a security issue,
\r
83 whereas auto-signing is not, so as long as we have the auto-encrypting
\r
84 always enabled that should ok.
\r
86 David, did you want to handle the patch? If not let me know and I'll do
\r
92 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
94 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
97 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTTCfoAAoJEO00zqvie6q8+aYP/3Q/1DGHJ5A7KD6Io3XNIdEC
\r
98 yrcHOzzWOiiEbKaheThvKvVc9tf/QwG8OLvFciPx78xORHETA0MJ5Cw+HPHurRY8
\r
99 rNSLuaZbsLu0wwEC9TX+vdc53GzTbB1HtfkhYUVPE01OfERpSrLOvm4ytj7TWWwa
\r
100 h556/427oLh0SA31UeVtTDvJFS95uWK3VKBUjfwFT58KsTGGlxRmoqchGsnvy9Aq
\r
101 SLnB06TLE7Jn42VzHViZ3NlMrcN1SEu+QDGdtrnqumTN63eFZZ/FLDHKYKiWACvZ
\r
102 qHaoU7pT8BcOlOzNpYRnab6+9xOfkFzGseyusTVURpxOOjiAezlWcE58n1nKIqdf
\r
103 49tYfXjLhJrFWGonmxbzeZwMNPiJvTFUIoOcRYPosXg0mhr+nG7jpnTOiG97Nolj
\r
104 qTUSLYig6TvJoAO1f5uE3l9JhdAcaiUcj3Pma21l34VgedDs1Jnc/23IndhderVw
\r
105 Es+8HdWPZrBiufMg4Qz42x932XbLu8nvieXJoZZK8SrN0xKOjxmsb/8i2Snoq2QU
\r
106 8lRyHULf4ZwjIxg9TDjGKxgsYqQ6jWZvXVioGliPSkeTjCC2HyRrrZ1Omnc2oK6e
\r
107 Sz/632J2IqlB/uWCqqU6vkgOwmcQ5tZ+KK7t37bhXFXOMMZTw7fkjCUchBd7tfu1
\r
108 51CTI0+XSvjPzQjlstOc
\r
110 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r