d9/fc3f0d34cc21b1905d3f84109c0a6614c10d7b

   1 Return-Path: <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39B740BD9B\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:06:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -2\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,\r
  12         DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,       DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id 5fELnCv73Rrw for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:05:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
  17 Received: from homiemail-a13.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdccah.dreamhost.com\r
  18         [208.97.132.207])\r
  19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62CE40BC9C\r
  20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:05:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
  21 Received: from homiemail-a13.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
  22         by homiemail-a13.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BE56A807F;\r
  23         Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:05:52 -0700 (PDT)\r
  24 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:subject\r
  25         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:\r
  26         content-type; q=dns; s=sspaeth.de; b=layy9XnsoTr5bXrNW90+biHZ1oB\r
  27         aULVz4tD/KC9S1P8pYoRLHxSTmuAUkeslUET7TYjTVaUcT3w4+fLLxd7tDgznjUz\r
  28         UVVsGeXkwY6VCbUoYK85ydT3Bn0ZSjXqTeSU4ZAx63mVAg4/E/97gViQfzS44PoY\r
  29         gSHd004dGnKTG99Y=\r
  30 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to\r
  31         :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:\r
  32         content-type; s=sspaeth.de; bh=wWis5X5EkAY3QGFGQicIVDj2v+k=; b=V\r
  33         yjZ6/JyVKtfiX9O7Uk6xFsi3/oDtAGjh8mWwko8R26Qkcwm0QaMWdsNNDMuVcmW8\r
  34         lC6xYIKqhMfcjvPj7iY37tGqfhviLL8AV+0EDJ0/DZYT93ipnYxN5xS9wzOoHAUR\r
  35         yJWSYYtqahJhRdXxyg+spO+eI339OvCIqNH/4JfLNE=\r
  36 Received: from spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (mtec-hg-docking-2-dhcp-016.ethz.ch\r
  37         [82.130.121.16]) (Authenticated sender: fax@sspaeth.de)\r
  38         by homiemail-a13.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 56DC66A807A; \r
  39         Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:05:51 -0700 (PDT)\r
  40 Received: by spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation);\r
  41         Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:05:49 +0200\r
  42 From: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>\r
  43 To: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  44 Subject: Re: Would a more sophisticated notmuch-fcc-dirs be acceptable?\r
  45 In-Reply-To: <87k4m80xgg.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org>\r
  46 References: <87k4m80xgg.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org>\r
  47 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-43-g5d515b7 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1\r
  48         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
  49 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:05:49 +0200\r
  50 Message-ID: <871v8fusz6.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
  51 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
  53 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  54 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  55 Precedence: list\r
  56 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  57         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  58 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  59         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  60 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  61 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  62 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  63 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  64         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  65 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:06:07 -0000\r
  66 \r
  67 On 2010-09-27, Rob Browning wrote:\r
  68 > I'd like to be able to archive to a destination based on the year, i.e.:\r
  69 > \r
  70 >   (concat "sent-" (format-time-string "%Y"))\r
  71 \r
  72 At it seems that this can potentially very confusing for\r
  73 configuring. Wouldn't it be nicest if that config variable were able to\r
  74 take a function that returns one or multiple FCC paths? This way people\r
  75 could become really creative in their .emacs.\r
  76 \r
  77 Personally, I would love if we could keep the default configuration (1\r
  78 FCC dir that never changes) as simple as a string value. I have no\r
  79 problems with the second patch that you sent (ability to use absolute\r
  80 paths). That having said, if you have nice patches that cworth is\r
  81 willing to accept, any solution is good to me.\r
  82 \r
  83 Sebastian\r