d9/b48f29e6ef242327ed336b028e81dbdb9d4c4c

   1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBFD431FBD\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  2 Feb 2010 14:36:52 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -3.574\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.425,\r
  12         BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] autolearn=ham\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id Z+GX-Jzd0Iie for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Tue,  2 Feb 2010 14:36:51 -0800 (PST)\r
  17 Received: from serrano.cc.columbia.edu (serrano.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.6])\r
  18         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04E5431FAE\r
  19         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  2 Feb 2010 14:36:51 -0800 (PST)\r
  20 Received: from servo.finestructure.net (geco.phys.columbia.edu\r
  21         [128.59.170.159])\r
  22         (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0)\r
  23         by serrano.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o12MaN23029315\r
  24         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
  25         Tue, 2 Feb 2010 17:36:24 -0500 (EST)\r
  26 Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.71)\r
  27         (envelope-from <jrollins@finestructure.net>)\r
  28         id 1NcRM7-00018b-67; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:36:23 -0500\r
  29 From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
  30 To: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  31 In-Reply-To: <201002022325.18878.sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
  32 References: <201001291049.21048.sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
  33         <873a1jebve.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  34         <87r5p3l3yd.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net>\r
  35         <201002022325.18878.sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
  36 Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:36:18 -0500\r
  37 Message-ID: <87ljfbcljx.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  38 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  39 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
  40         micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
  41 X-No-Spam-Score: Local\r
  42 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.6\r
  43 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCHv2] Preserve folder information when indexing\r
  44 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  45 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  46 Precedence: list\r
  47 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  48         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  49 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  50         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  51 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  52 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  53 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  54 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  55         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  56 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:36:53 -0000\r
  57 \r
  58 --=-=-=\r
  59 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
  60 \r
  61 On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:25:18 +0100, Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> wrote:\r
  62 > On Tuesday 02 February 2010 22:31:38 micah anderson wrote:\r
  63 > > The easiest way to answer this question is to try it. I did that, and\r
  64 > > things didn't work as expected. I expected that once the message was\r
  65 > > moved to a different folder, and 'notmuch new' was run, then the folder\r
  66 > > search result would move with the message move.\r
  67 >=20\r
  68 > I want it to work the same way as you expected. It seems it would be nece=\r
  69 ssary=20\r
  70 > to modify notmuch_database_remove_message() so that it changes folder ter=\r
  71 m if=20\r
  72 > it detects rename.\r
  73 \r
  74 Hey, Michal.  I agree that this is a necessary improvement.  It would\r
  75 also be nice if messages that don't currently have the field have it\r
  76 added, whether or not they're in the database to begin with.  This is\r
  77 important for getting the field on messages that are already in the\r
  78 database.\r
  79 \r
  80 jamie.\r
  81 \r
  82 --=-=-=\r
  83 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
  84 \r
  85 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  86 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
  87 \r
  88 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLaKjjAAoJEO00zqvie6q88N8P/2n5MCYXwq9FdNWDqXqfg/Su\r
  89 g3ZteAySLdWjEK/AIIUVG8eNLs84PxQhUvCZiuqidvar3ldqAC9DXWHKVqf5kFyj\r
  90 hEVq+tq06tuP2A54aEnxBGjSYaTw8X6WcKi8zO2tOuyVoS8YL8w0heRSQceE5uQf\r
  91 wtwHUmRUPb4+ooLXEdMRbLO4H+0r0fTTMZcwK+/5HQ3UOf6DNSZE4ENm2RlJ+6xy\r
  92 3mkjxIttgrxbGqSSYQvOnFgBSxpiPMsrp3ouIDFpjKll1pkXaYG1wVqYqKAV+0BF\r
  93 hpUwTVIaB4yeeAkmY1B1EpMkYnoB/r96qMpREFBgialwJgXw8WY9BjPETZo+JRTr\r
  94 R9c4V+Qh0IOgfrzwSJrSdXVRTP4LDB92NN/K7hr8F6U/VVi5HO5Sa9Sz4kriFpzc\r
  95 D/Rfu1mFWKeb+9WdkHVtFXMRhMN9D7nwRvho9/D6kdClcatqP6NJHlm2IJY9xUtV\r
  96 MGuobu3+YjyCI6+0Z9EBekBvuNiFgyNoiinvaya1jIRJZlxMNCAVuR8wSI1YXMQ3\r
  97 0loixKm9dqNJI6HQNtU0U37ZbmalICmX3CXAcTc2k/Tg3bP/ihL6ihWL4Pqswib+\r
  98 7sQKj/HgFUUOcZL9PZxqTzu6hPfJUZePnZ/xzigVniKSZwuobjXBv/Tx657q7uAE\r
  99 GkkgY1Hg1Jq7MjG4R3wA\r
 100 =v3sX\r
 101 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
 102 --=-=-=--\r