1 Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29D3431FC4
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:44:30 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.738 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7]
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id 2dDQ82LdFgF8 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:44:28 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com (mail-wg0-f41.google.com
\r
19 [74.125.82.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client
\r
20 certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
\r
21 B8108431FC2 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:44:27 -0800
\r
23 Received: by wghl18 with SMTP id l18so3436124wgh.7
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:36:39 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
26 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
\r
27 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references
\r
28 :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
29 bh=VP2QIWjA5GMaFOSdNuVr+8Ao+qi6XAIFcrA4gnsftGA=;
\r
30 b=cabKhj2G24K8B1NUcD6f9wct7SiqL4HTGDu/o7rba9mZScAZk8ZW28zHtD9PD91IIW
\r
31 MV59WQDfDk4r1j6I1FPZbB212yM5cEidtcDSoLBjrnTjjZVDFjoWcrfT9AnWV19N7GtW
\r
32 CWy+seg1CcqJi26lvGI7xGE5RwExaWTZjjvcy5gfJ3V/YRKmDJpK5ibKFcLE4FfOJF2X
\r
33 xqg7v8pdo67enXtLRy9dXE9RndzMeqGpvkAh+ButDE7T/Ab+qAmPX6F8l4kZZC/uknsK
\r
34 WuEgSmKmbrTcf9VL1hKlZCoEvgFcY6euS8rJMvEOZM1u853cNz61GXPBu86uxq5TAqZo
\r
37 ALoCoQmaBI93fbIoU2WoOQCbTMoxs5VpeUzC4ffkyxxsuCshY3ymI+Fc2TCoSjYvm+NXOIkxfH2L
\r
38 X-Received: by 10.194.87.100 with SMTP id w4mr28882452wjz.65.1424763399566;
\r
39 Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:36:39 -0800 (PST)
\r
40 Received: from localhost ([2001:4b98:dc0:43:216:3eff:fe1b:25f3])
\r
41 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hs7sm19242242wib.4.2015.02.23.23.36.38
\r
42 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
\r
43 Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:36:38 -0800 (PST)
\r
44 From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
\r
45 To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
46 Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] completion: complete addresses in from:/to:
\r
48 In-Reply-To: <m2fv9vhjfr.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
49 References: <1422388098-16333-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org>
\r
50 <1422388098-16333-5-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org>
\r
51 <m2fv9vhjfr.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
52 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+48~gb74ed1c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
\r
53 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
54 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:37:18 +0100
\r
55 Message-ID: <877fv7u5e9.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
57 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
58 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
59 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
61 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
62 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
63 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
65 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
66 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
67 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
68 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
69 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
70 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 07:44:31 -0000
\r
72 On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote:
\r
73 > On Tue, Jan 27 2015, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
\r
75 >> Use the new notmuch address command to do completion for addresses in
\r
80 >> This patch is more of an RFC. The to: completion is sloooow because
\r
81 >> typically there are more matches to begin with, and then producing the
\r
82 >> results requires reading the messages. Maybe it would be better to use
\r
83 >> the same mechanism as from: for both, even if it's not accurate for
\r
86 > Shameless marketing puff: Imagine how fast would it would be to use
\r
87 > nottoomuch-addresses -- the completions are there before one
\r
88 > sees TAB KeyRelease event... ;)
\r
92 $ notmuch search to:tomiTABnottoomuch-addresses.sh: command not found
\r
94 I like the completion to be self contained.
\r