Re: [PATCH] emacs: wash: make word-wrap bound message width
[notmuch-archives.git] / d9 / 9c433b4f68eb8f1ba448193a576daa92e9c069
1 Return-Path: <xuwang762@gmail.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5  by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDBFB6DE0AF8\r
6  for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 09:34:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -0.576\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.576 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12  tests=[AWL=-0.006, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,\r
13  DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25,\r
14  FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,\r
15  RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled\r
16 Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
17  by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
18  with ESMTP id d07nifzB5cYO for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
19  Sat, 18 Jul 2015 09:34:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
20 Received: from mail-oi0-f66.google.com (mail-oi0-f66.google.com\r
21  [209.85.218.66])\r
22  by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9C2F6DE0352\r
23  for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 09:34:16 -0700 (PDT)\r
24 Received: by oiho132 with SMTP id o132so5850851oih.1\r
25  for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 09:34:16 -0700 (PDT)\r
26 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
27  h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to\r
28  :content-type; bh=IZJ0MQ5GgiGDXMSp22Al+12jiuONpkWlIKo9M710tU8=;\r
29  b=V4AFySxEfV8V3glZ4r7J1IsZsBguCPdRMHccbKzN7jHwA58Ccd5aYpGctXHJ9015Z1\r
30  yeE07PkK+ApvEE8ssbEw7uG5vluaUdWTogjRfR5TBsqAbI2XDTF1hevUzX8zoWfylo89\r
31  yTVOPeZGQ/nbvBqp2NsehwzYOaHjm/jjKzzsHn5ClfL6Z8Fs8HPp1dqZykO2B6h6ZKK5\r
32  xKm9et3ucadrjxPzwd1eYBxUtbZFDekLKK6q8sHoVxyd1Y4SsihLDy3OnFTBRqMMvuFm\r
33  IDSzNWm25AUMDhs6voeeCLgjJzJjjwYH30lALKd833pqzk9yJ9H6Ym+2EW6jvIrs+L9Q\r
34  vh2w==\r
35 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
36 X-Received: by 10.182.246.202 with SMTP id xy10mr18519080obc.64.1437237256105;\r
37   Sat, 18 Jul 2015 09:34:16 -0700 (PDT)\r
38 Received: by 10.182.241.167 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 09:34:16 -0700 (PDT)\r
39 In-Reply-To: <20150718153239.GB4527@chitra.no-ip.org>\r
40 References: <20150717121111.GF25651@chitra.no-ip.org>\r
41  <55A923E9.5070509@imca-cat.org>\r
42  <20150718091139.GB8311@chitra.no-ip.org>\r
43  <CAJhTkNhQtWbt2-ZudUz4bxC98HOC9W-moUohUDaiDuULNXqb9g@mail.gmail.com>\r
44  <20150718153239.GB4527@chitra.no-ip.org>\r
45 Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 12:34:16 -0400\r
46 Message-ID:\r
47  <CAJhTkNjF-5AFXHkrCLPPp6oKSbuqYEZnf1XQAsQjd6bRUd=jUQ@mail.gmail.com>\r
48 Subject: Re: Searching for phrases in the body of an email\r
49 From: Xu Wang <xuwang762@gmail.com>\r
50 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
52 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
53 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18\r
54 Precedence: list\r
55 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
56  <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
57 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
58  <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
59 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
60 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
61 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
62 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
63  <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
64 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 16:34:18 -0000\r
65 \r
66 On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Suvayu Ali\r
67 <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com> wrote:\r
68 \r
69 > Of course this does not help me solve my original goal, but I guess now\r
70 > I can try different queries based on your idea.\r
71 \r
72 Ah I see. Your goal is to search for phrases close to "no plain text".\r
73 But if you use fuzzy searching but an exact grep, then it is normal\r
74 that the numbers are not consistent, no? Because your grep is not\r
75 fuzzy.\r
76 \r
77 Kind regards,\r
78 \r
79 Xu\r