1 Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1273B6DE1479
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:56:34 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.144 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[AWL=-0.168, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,
\r
13 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, URIBL_SBL=0.644, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1]
\r
15 Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
16 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
17 with ESMTP id QkI9UY90aOqt for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
18 Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
\r
19 Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com
\r
21 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A60026DE143A
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so253472086wic.0
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
26 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
\r
27 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references
\r
28 :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
29 bh=mjHXvEYGY1ZJrd3UAFQ+gAa6xvbqx7Keg9XZwwfZ7k8=;
\r
30 b=StEfazSstN8fSsUCbwfu2FzH2g2EK4S9CQ5gAgikiDEKFIc+imk7sV/PVwqtA4+pZc
\r
31 mDGHA5TvABrn8TlwJWEy4u0RfGUTwQogNZKHM2ykToUaHHGtVI32b2YDnnKDxuqBDnv1
\r
32 WCx92kLo6ZDLybNqUpgwzUb4ca1PNMkfFPvXx9al2aoLRekM5o0PjEvNRdiLgxNhY5bZ
\r
33 bXU9ZrRicz4ADEs6Oih1dNpyWr7y33rFx5nEVAiDR+eqA6PDvNixXw3mxpBuesiOWgD0
\r
34 iTFlqFdt+s1iTvL9gKg5T7MgRN3n5419nZyFOERTc5uiVsENqbtTlLgBX7jYWIE8qBvA
\r
37 ALoCoQmqIbfobOsIT837lbd5u5M4Rgjjy2Sa4HB6gLQff2VrUQ4ydF3a8nhxxysfmFjx1JXS/MGc
\r
38 X-Received: by 10.180.8.200 with SMTP id t8mr5756474wia.34.1443034589978;
\r
39 Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
\r
40 Received: from localhost (mobile-access-bcee4f-131.dhcp.inet.fi.
\r
42 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ly4sm8643103wjb.4.2015.09.23.11.56.29
\r
43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
44 Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
\r
45 From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
\r
46 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
47 Subject: Re: [PATCH =?utf-8?Q?3=C2=BD=2F9=5D?= test: notmuch address
\r
48 --deduplicate=no tests
\r
49 In-Reply-To: <87a8shtg4w.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
51 <fd59eadee26a770097517bee038e2b126e11aa90.1441308761.git.jani@nikula.org>
\r
52 <1441391716-17282-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org>
\r
53 <87a8shtg4w.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
54 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+66~gb33abd9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1
\r
55 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
56 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:56:11 +0300
\r
57 Message-ID: <87mvwddkxg.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
59 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
60 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
61 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
\r
63 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
64 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
65 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
66 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
67 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
\r
68 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
69 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
70 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
71 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
72 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 18:56:34 -0000
\r
74 On Sun, 20 Sep 2015, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
\r
75 > Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> writes:
\r
77 >> Test not using address deduplication. Incorporate some trivial output
\r
78 >> sorting tests here, as they seem to lack tests.
\r
80 >> test/T095-address.sh | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
\r
81 >> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
\r
83 >> diff --git a/test/T095-address.sh b/test/T095-address.sh
\r
84 >> index 8eecb2a6a7ba..f8d902cb3a5e 100755
\r
85 >> --- a/test/T095-address.sh
\r
86 >> +++ b/test/T095-address.sh
\r
87 >> @@ -145,4 +145,74 @@ cat <<EOF >EXPECTED
\r
89 >> test_expect_equal_file OUTPUT EXPECTED
\r
91 >> +test_begin_subtest "--deduplicate=no --sort=oldest-first --output=sender"
\r
92 >> +notmuch address --deduplicate=no --sort=oldest-first --output=sender '*' >OUTPUT
\r
93 >> +cat <<EOF >EXPECTED
\r
94 >> +Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@dottedmag.net>
\r
95 >> +Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@dottedmag.net>
\r
96 >> +Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
99 >> +test_begin_subtest "--deduplicate=no --sort=newest-first --output=sender --output=recipients"
\r
100 >> +notmuch address --deduplicate=no --sort=newest-first --output=sender --output=recipients path:foo/new >OUTPUT
\r
101 >> +cat <<EOF >EXPECTED
\r
102 >> +Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@dottedmag.net>
\r
103 >> +notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
104 >> +Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@dottedmag.net>
\r
108 > 1) It's suprising that Mikail is first in both the newest-first and
\r
109 > oldest-first list. Is it easy to explain why?
\r
111 > 2) the use of path: term is not mentioned in the description. Should it
\r
112 > be mentioned somehow?
\r
114 I wanted to have a smaller set of results in the second test, and path:
\r
115 was an easy filter so I could look at the files there to construct the
\r
116 expected results. That also explains the first part; it just so happened
\r
117 that the folder I arbitrarily picked happened to have Mikail there.
\r