1 Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71487431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id NvCRbaDD6mAt for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com (mail-wg0-f48.google.com
\r
18 [74.125.82.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client
\r
19 certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
\r
20 0F84C431FB6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:37:15 -0700
\r
22 Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id n12so7487166wgh.7
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
25 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
\r
26 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references
\r
27 :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 bh=VuQZdnGD97Jyao6h98dOSkk3BToCHSQWabkr/urbthU=;
\r
29 b=ghd2773bporsEmblrTI/blFIZ532Y7Ml1V5lObap6wTuF45+udYFtc5GUl/y5U5Jns
\r
30 9mA0z0DvV5fKxIEDHyuoXeDdF/l4aB+UDDAwX16LQfbrkYxxNtV+QNJ4DF4zT++MJKNp
\r
31 lvzAjo7IZMUh6aYHHck2vNTl9gh2ErG42vTM347eCy9+D+0cHz0VSBWlf/HSjqUXFwXe
\r
32 q9qWCgZ1Mu8xFG2VCx8FbplsRdPgmi9d061+2NdwBL/9ogtuVabfE4ev2kfxgkeKNLNQ
\r
33 UvxATeplsH9Fs5tLzd5Rs0li+w0xO8NMV02beqLnhUnuf8ITGxutMx+W5Gi1uh43ZpSO
\r
36 ALoCoQmR8AzVstxg9fKMAZJX16TS22XXz/TzE6QvzHzMYck47/u8sHFYdkDQ5zNY3hf+mXJkgO0T
\r
37 X-Received: by 10.181.5.3 with SMTP id ci3mr31295755wid.57.1409690234524;
\r
38 Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
\r
39 Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw2-58c374-75.dhcp.inet.fi.
\r
40 [88.195.116.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
\r
41 bt9sm11699723wjc.44.2014.09.02.13.37.13 for <multiple recipients>
\r
42 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
\r
43 Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
\r
44 From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
\r
45 To: Perttu Luukko <perttu.luukko@iki.fi>, David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
\r
46 Subject: Re: How to debug 'ignoring non-mail file' issues
\r
47 In-Reply-To: <20140901071526.GA13634@lakka.kapsi.fi>
\r
48 References: <20140831074059.GA13399@rakuuna.dhcp.inet.fi>
\r
49 <87tx4ssoux.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
50 <20140901065220.GB3901@lakka.kapsi.fi>
\r
51 <20140901071526.GA13634@lakka.kapsi.fi>
\r
52 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+65~g9f0f30f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
53 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
54 Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 23:37:12 +0300
\r
55 Message-ID: <87r3ztvjwn.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
57 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
58 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
59 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
60 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
62 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
63 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
64 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
65 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
66 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
67 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
68 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
69 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
70 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
71 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 20:37:24 -0000
\r
73 On Mon, 01 Sep 2014, Perttu Luukko <perttu.luukko@iki.fi> wrote:
\r
74 > Yes, upgrading to GMime 2.6.20 caused all the messages on my server
\r
75 > classified as mail.
\r
77 What was the old version? If it was 2.4 we should probably consider
\r
78 dropping support for that in future notmuch.
\r
80 > Even more reason to give a separate warning for GMime parse errors.
\r
82 Not sure. We only get a binary success/fail from GMime, and that gets
\r
83 printed for all non-email files. I'm not sure it's helpful.
\r